We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The PriceInterval Enum states that service fees should be expressed as 1_FAIXA, 2_FAIXA and so on.
1_FAIXA
2_FAIXA
However, the Personal Accounts response example is showing it like 1_FAIXA_VALOR and 2_FAIXA_VALOR.
1_FAIXA_VALOR
2_FAIXA_VALOR
Some financial institutions like Bradesco are wrongly returning it in most of their services, eg: https://api.bradesco.com/bradesco/open-banking/products-services/v1/personal-accounts https://api.bradesco.com/bradesco/open-banking/products-services/v1/business-unarranged-account-overdraft
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Merge pull request #256 from Sensedia/ORB-421
ba7161d
[ORB-421] changelog - ainda falta criar as versões anteriores
No branches or pull requests
The PriceInterval Enum states that service fees should be expressed as
1_FAIXA
,2_FAIXA
and so on.However, the Personal Accounts response example is showing it like
1_FAIXA_VALOR
and2_FAIXA_VALOR
.Some financial institutions like Bradesco are wrongly returning it in most of their services, eg:
https://api.bradesco.com/bradesco/open-banking/products-services/v1/personal-accounts
https://api.bradesco.com/bradesco/open-banking/products-services/v1/business-unarranged-account-overdraft
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: