-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 180
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Align Tool: atoms have to be reselected to realign to different axis #1665
Comments
Here are the build results |
Here are the build results |
matterhorn103
pushed a commit
to matterhorn103/avogadrolibs
that referenced
this issue
Jan 13, 2025
Fix OpenChemistry#1665 Signed-off-by: Geoff Hutchison <[email protected]>
peach280
pushed a commit
to peach280/avogadrolibs
that referenced
this issue
Jan 20, 2025
Fix OpenChemistry#1665 Signed-off-by: Geoff Hutchison <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
This is with the current nightly AppImage, haven't tested with other versions yet.
Avogadro version: (please complete the following information from the About box):
Desktop version: (please complete the following information):
Describe the bug
To align a bond (or any two atoms even if not bonded) to one of the principal axes, you can select the chosen axis from the drop-down, and select two atoms in the view. Those two steps can be done in either order.
After then clicking
Align
, the molecules in the view are realigned appropriately. The two atoms that were selected remain selected and labelled with#1
and#2
. However, changing the axis and then clicking align again doesn't result in a second realignment – the two atoms must be reselected.To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected behavior
Clicking
Align
should always result in realignment based on the current selection, without reselection being required.Alternatively, all atoms should be automatically deselected after an alignment is carried out.
Both would match user expectations. The latter is less good though, as it would be convenient to be able to quickly compare the alignment to several different axes. Especially since the axes are unlabelled, meaning the user might not align to the correct axis on the first attempt.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: