Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release - Patch Version - 2.0.3 #251

Open
4 of 9 tasks
Ludee opened this issue Jan 28, 2025 · 7 comments
Open
4 of 9 tasks

Release - Patch Version - 2.0.3 #251

Ludee opened this issue Jan 28, 2025 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
part: github :octocat: Improvement of the organisation or repo priority: critical 🔥 Critical priority status: active 🚧 Work in progress type: release 🚀 Release procedure

Comments

@Ludee
Copy link
Member

Ludee commented Jan 28, 2025

Description of the release

The installation of the package fails.

Details of the release

Name: Patchy McPatchface
Git tag: v2.0.3 "OEMetadata Patch Release v2.0.3"
Release Manager: @Ludee
Date: 2025-02-06

Workflow checklist

  • I am aware of the workflow in RELEASE_PROCEDURE.md
  • 4. 🐙 Create a Draft GitHub Release
  • 5. 💠 Create a release branch
  • 6. 📝 Update the version files (CHANGELOG.md, CITATION.cff)
  • 7. 🐙 Create a Release Pull Request
  • 8. 💠 Set the Git Tag
  • 9. 🐙 Publish GitHub Release
  • 10. 💻 Update the documentation
  • 11. 🐙 Set up new development
@Ludee Ludee added part: github :octocat: Improvement of the organisation or repo priority: critical 🔥 Critical priority status: active 🚧 Work in progress type: release 🚀 Release procedure labels Jan 28, 2025
@Ludee Ludee self-assigned this Jan 28, 2025
@Ludee Ludee moved this to In Progress in OEMetadata v2.0 Jan 29, 2025
Ludee added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 6, 2025
Ludee added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 6, 2025
Ludee added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 6, 2025
@jh-RLI
Copy link
Contributor

jh-RLI commented Feb 12, 2025

Some things are missing here for the patch release which i already merged. I think having another patch release is feasible ... we already found some new issues in the json-ld context.

@jh-RLI
Copy link
Contributor

jh-RLI commented Feb 12, 2025

Ach, i forgot that there was the issue regarding the new setup config. The pypi deployment still fails.

@Ludee
Copy link
Member Author

Ludee commented Feb 13, 2025

The specification for the new pyproject.toml needs to have the same name as the package folder.

Source: https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/specifications/pyproject-toml/

The folder "metadata" needs to be renamed to "oemetadata"

@jh-RLI
Copy link
Contributor

jh-RLI commented Feb 13, 2025

This will break virtually any third party implementation of oemeta data as all imports will fail.

@Ludee
Copy link
Member Author

Ludee commented Feb 13, 2025

At the moment, they are failing anyway.
The folder rename will have to be changed in a lot of places:

  • base_folders
  • scripts
  • tests
  • documentation and README

@jh-RLI
Copy link
Contributor

jh-RLI commented Feb 13, 2025

And any link we provide in OEP, academy, compendium and more?

@Ludee
Copy link
Member Author

Ludee commented Feb 13, 2025

"Move slow and break things"
That is good title for the next release 🤣

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
part: github :octocat: Improvement of the organisation or repo priority: critical 🔥 Critical priority status: active 🚧 Work in progress type: release 🚀 Release procedure
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants