Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Number of instances is ignored in FSunstone #6716

Closed
2 of 3 tasks
alpeon opened this issue Sep 10, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by OpenNebula/docs#3129
Closed
2 of 3 tasks

Number of instances is ignored in FSunstone #6716

alpeon opened this issue Sep 10, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by OpenNebula/docs#3129

Comments

@alpeon
Copy link

alpeon commented Sep 10, 2024

Description
When instantiating service from the template you are presented with an option to instantiate multiple services at the same time. The value entered in the field is ignored and no default value.

To Reproduce

  1. Create a Service Template.
  2. Instantiate a Service template using FSunstone.
  3. Enter 2 or more in the Number of instances field.
  4. Finish the instantiation

You supposed to have only one service despite the number entered.

Expected behavior

  1. Must instantiate the correct number of services.
  2. There must be the default value pre-defined or should fall-back to the default value 1 if not configured.

Details

  • Affected Component: FSunstone
  • Version: 6.10

Additional context
N/A

Progress Status

  • Code committed
  • Testing - QA
  • Documentation (Release notes - resolved issues, compatibility, known issues)
@vichansson vichansson self-assigned this Sep 10, 2024
@tinova tinova added this to the Release 6.10.1 milestone Sep 10, 2024
@tinova tinova closed this as completed Sep 10, 2024
@tinova tinova reopened this Sep 10, 2024
vichansson added a commit to OpenNebula/docs that referenced this issue Dec 13, 2024
@vichansson vichansson linked a pull request Dec 13, 2024 that will close this issue
2 tasks
tinova pushed a commit to OpenNebula/docs that referenced this issue Dec 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants