You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've been thinking about heat transfer and heterogeneous reactions.
Idea 1: Split throats to put a "throat node" in the middle of each one
I wonder if there is any value to splitting each throat and adding a new node in the middle. This node would have a known mass/heat transfer coefficient since the flow rate is properly known in a throat. We could also treat it as the "concentration at the wall", and get the bulk concentration as some average of the two neighboring pore values. This way we could include a driving force between the bulk and surface in the reaction. The down side is obviously that it increases the number of unknowns quite a bit.
Idea 2: Fictitious side nodes attached to each pore
This would allow us to solve the bulk concentration in the pore, as we do now, but also have a mass transfer resistance from the pore center to some dead-end 'fictitious' pore where the reaction actually happens. This would not solve the heat/mass transfer coefficient problem though. It also doubles the number of unknowns (although you'd only have to add them to pores where reaction occurs, which is usually a subset of the total).
Idea 3: Dual networks
If you use a dual network, then all pores are connected to a 'solid' node already, and the reaction could happen in the solid nodes. This is similar to the fictitious node approach but is a bit more physical.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
I've been thinking about heat transfer and heterogeneous reactions.
Idea 1: Split throats to put a "throat node" in the middle of each one
I wonder if there is any value to splitting each throat and adding a new node in the middle. This node would have a known mass/heat transfer coefficient since the flow rate is properly known in a throat. We could also treat it as the "concentration at the wall", and get the bulk concentration as some average of the two neighboring pore values. This way we could include a driving force between the bulk and surface in the reaction. The down side is obviously that it increases the number of unknowns quite a bit.
Idea 2: Fictitious side nodes attached to each pore
This would allow us to solve the bulk concentration in the pore, as we do now, but also have a mass transfer resistance from the pore center to some dead-end 'fictitious' pore where the reaction actually happens. This would not solve the heat/mass transfer coefficient problem though. It also doubles the number of unknowns (although you'd only have to add them to pores where reaction occurs, which is usually a subset of the total).
Idea 3: Dual networks
If you use a dual network, then all pores are connected to a 'solid' node already, and the reaction could happen in the solid nodes. This is similar to the fictitious node approach but is a bit more physical.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions