Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Get working BioCyc model #79

Open
djinnome opened this issue Mar 24, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Get working BioCyc model #79

djinnome opened this issue Mar 24, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@djinnome
Copy link
Member

To minimize the curation effort required to get a working model in RhodoCyc, we start with the current FBA model (Joonhoon's model), and we add a penalty to the objective for every reaction that does not have a biocyc mapping. We then run FBA and the number of reactions without biocyc mappings that have nonzero fluxes should be close to the minimum number of reactions that need to be mapped to get a working FBA model.

@ShantMahserejian does this make sense?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants