-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 798
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I want to use Gazebo to emulate Caipiroshka Duo Tailsitter #1008
Comments
Yes, and is it possible to somehow add tilt rotors for hover mode?))) |
Thank you for your reply! I don't think that's quite right. From the PX4 source code analysis, the difference between Caipiroshka Duo Tailsitter and Tailsitter is that the tailsitter only needs 4 rotor motors to take off smoothly during takeoff. Besides the two rotor motors, two rudder motors are also needed to maintain the attitude balance. The modeling effect of Caipiroshka Duo Tailsitter's rudder model is not good, but I do not know how to improve it. I don't think that's quite right. From the PX4 source code analysis, the difference between Caipiroshka Duo Tailsitter and Tailsitter is that the tailsitter only needs 4 rotor motors to take off smoothly during takeoff. Besides the two rotor motors, two rudder motors are also needed to maintain the attitude balance. The modeling effect of Caipiroshka Duo Tailsitter's rudder model is not good, but I do not know how to improve it. |
My idea is to replace the elevons with a servo drive that tilts the rotor according to one axis, pitch (roll & yaw we have in 2 rotos on hover mode) for hanging in a vertical position perhaps this will require a non-standard airframe and also add 2 servo for the elevons in horizont fly. It is difficult to simulate the moments occurring at the elevons because gazebo models thrust as a force and not a stream of particles reflected from the rudders, but I think it’s possible to rotate the thrust vector of the engines themselves along one axis of pitch? In the gazebo there is an example of tiltrotor, you need to combine them with the example of a tailsitter on two motors if the angular position of the rotors can be controlled, you get a thrust vector. |
@Jaeyoung-Lim Can you provide a starting point for this, or is it something that needs to be addressed first though the vtol discussion boards and perhaps with Silvan/Roman? |
@waitfordark Which model are we talking about? Duo tailsitter's primary dynamics comes from the control surface actuated under the propwash of the motor. If you want to simulate this, you would need to model the physics of this in gazebo first. |
@Jaeyoung-Lim Yes, we're focusing on Duo tailsitter. I have adjusted the elevon model and model parameters in the last two days, and now it can hover stably. Thank you for your attention! @hamishwillee @Userpc1010 |
I did some tests with my model with two rotors and ran into a problem with the signals from the elevons freezing during vertical takeoff. I also tried to reconfigure the airframe manually in QGC (using Caipiroshka Duo Tailsitter) but got the same result the PWM outputs (3,4,5,6 channel) after the start freeze at position 1000 or 1500 without controlling the pitch(((. Although in horizontal flight they try to work: My model: Tilt rotor not correct to: Upd: At the moment, the tilt rotors control are moved to channel 7 (.sdf) for tests in horizontal mode, because In a way I don’t understand, the model takes off without pitch control (only using two rotors). |
@Userpc1010 Secondly, it should be noted that in the simulation process, the input control amount of the rudder motor is positive and negative. At the same time, the installation position of the motor I set is above the center of gravity of the aircraft, and the installation position of the steering gear is below the center of gravity of the aircraft. I hope my reply can help you! |
At present, Gazebo can simulate tailsitter, and I want to simulate caipiroshka duo tailsitter through gazebo.
During the current simulation, caipiroshka duo tailsitter always has attitude confusion when taking off. Which led to the crash. After comparing the caipiroshka duo tailsitter, it is found that Caipiroshka Duo tailsitter needs two rudder surfaces for attitude control during takeoff. I guess it is because my rudder model is not accurate enough, which leads to the takeoff failure, but I still can't adjust it.
I would like to ask you to give me some suggestions.
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: