Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change remaining items to match naming conventions #389

Closed
3 tasks done
bording opened this issue May 31, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed
3 tasks done

Change remaining items to match naming conventions #389

bording opened this issue May 31, 2017 · 4 comments
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@bording
Copy link
Member

bording commented May 31, 2017

#384 adjusted as much as possible to follow the naming conventions, but there are some things that couldn't be changed without introducing breaks of some kind. We should consider adjusting these as well when we can.

Plan of attack

@bording bording added this to the 5.0.0 milestone May 31, 2017
@adamralph adamralph self-assigned this Sep 5, 2017
@adamralph adamralph mentioned this issue Sep 5, 2017
@adamralph
Copy link
Member

FYI I changed the CI project name, which meant I had to override the inherited GitUrl parameters to point to the "wrongly" named repo, and also, for the regular build (the old non-.NET Core build which is paused), I had to override the SolutionPath parameter to point the "wrongly" named NServiceBus.RabbitMQ.sln.

This was referenced Sep 5, 2017
@adamralph
Copy link
Member

@Particular/rabbitmq-transport-maintainers I've crossed out the "NuGet package ID" item since it seems it's best to keep it as-is, and only use the convention for new packages.

@adamralph adamralph removed their assignment Sep 12, 2017
@bording
Copy link
Member Author

bording commented Sep 14, 2017

Is there anything else here that we actually want to change? I see Repo name is still unchecked, though I'm wondering if changing that will also have impacts on CI that aren't worth it?

@adamralph
Copy link
Member

As discussed, we'll leave the repo name as-is for now. Raised #433 for that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants