Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

365nm Light source for Anycubic photon #18

Open
bibekraut opened this issue Jan 9, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

365nm Light source for Anycubic photon #18

bibekraut opened this issue Jan 9, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@bibekraut
Copy link

bibekraut commented Jan 9, 2019

Anycubic light source uses a 405nm LED (visible range) . There are some printers that uses 365nm light source. It seems the light source for Anycubic can be replaced to 385nm so as allow use of other materials that are photo curable at 385nm. I am looking for such an alternative (light source). Is there any suggestions to guide me on this (light source selection and replacement). Thanks

@X3msnake
Copy link
Member

You might face some problems with the shorter wavelenghts, I'm not sure how the Polarizers and the glass in the LCD screen behave. If they block shorter UV waves or not, but nothing like trying.

Photon uses 4 high power Leds, all you need to do is replicate the PCB or source a dead LED and replace them with similar leds but at 365nm. Powerwise if you keep the same wattage should be the same you will probably don't even need to change the Step Up converter that the original photon comes with.

Keep us posted ;)

@esseeayen
Copy link

After extensive testing for our product (http://labs.getshift.io) we realised that the polariser starts blocking very aggressively below 400nm. We tested down to 365nm and although some of the light got through the cure times were much longer.

@X3msnake
Copy link
Member

X3msnake commented Jan 29, 2019 via email

@wwboynton
Copy link

Hey @esseeayen, your website seems to be gone now. Have you relocated it?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants