Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(prod/jenkins): adjust jvm xmx to 16g #1357

Conversation

purelind
Copy link
Contributor

@purelind purelind commented Dec 1, 2024

adjust jvm xmx to 16g.

Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Dec 1, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from purelind, ensuring that each of them provides their approval before proceeding. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot requested a review from wuhuizuo December 1, 2024 06:43
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added area/apps env/prod will deploy on the main product cluster labels Dec 1, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Dec 1, 2024

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Based on the pull request, it seems that the change is adjusting the JVM xmx to 16g in the values-controller.yaml file for the prod/jenkins application. This may be an attempt to optimize the application's performance by allocating more memory to the JVM.

However, there are a few potential issues that need to be addressed. Firstly, it's unclear why the change is necessary. Is the application experiencing memory-related performance issues? Secondly, increasing the JVM xmx to 16g may not be the most efficient way to optimize the application's performance. It's possible that the issue could be caused by inefficient code or database queries.

To address these issues, it may be helpful to gather more information about the application's performance and identify the root cause of the issue. If necessary, a performance audit or code review may be needed to optimize the application's performance.

Additionally, it would be helpful if the pull request had a more detailed description of the reasons for the change and the expected impact on the application's performance.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the size/XS label Dec 1, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Dec 1, 2024

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Based on the Pull Request, the key change is to adjust the JVM Xmx to 16g using the -XX:InitialRAMPercentage=20.0 -XX:MaxRAMPercentage=60.0 flags. This will increase the maximum heap size for the Jenkins application in the prod environment.

There don't seem to be any potential problems with this change as it is just a configuration change, and the flags used are commonly used for JVM heap size management. However, it is recommended to ensure that the machine running the Jenkins application has sufficient resources to support the new heap size.

As for suggestions, it would be good to add some context to the PR description, such as why the change is being made and what problem it solves. Additionally, it would be good to ensure that the change is tested and that the Jenkins application is running correctly with the new heap size.

@purelind purelind merged commit 72dee17 into PingCAP-QE:main Dec 1, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/apps env/prod will deploy on the main product cluster size/XS
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant