Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

prediction convertion? #110

Open
bututoubaobei-0108 opened this issue Oct 30, 2024 · 6 comments
Open

prediction convertion? #110

bututoubaobei-0108 opened this issue Oct 30, 2024 · 6 comments

Comments

@bututoubaobei-0108
Copy link

bututoubaobei-0108 commented Oct 30, 2024

Hello,

I try to run the code of testing, and use the model "mode_best.pth" in hugging face for s3dis segmentation: https://huggingface.co/Pointcept/PointTransformerV3/tree/main/s3dis-semseg-pt-v3m1-0-rpe/model
However, when I apply the predicted label on the coordinates of the point clouds, for example, on area5_hallway9, the obtained hallway form does not correspond to the one obtained when I apply the groud truth label on the same coordinates of the point clouds.

For example, in the point clouds with the predicted labels, the roof has holes, and the hallway has some obstacles, which do not appear in the point clouds with the ground truth labels.

However, when I do not apply the labels to the point clouds, and only visualize the point clouds, the form is different from both the point clouds with predicted labels and those with groud truth labels.

Do you know what the problem is?

groundtruth_2.mp4
prediction_2.mp4
without_label_2.mp4
@Gofinge
Copy link
Member

Gofinge commented Oct 30, 2024

Nice visualization, how about first check the number metric of testing is matched? The released weight is for PTv3 is with Pointcept v1.5.1. I remember there exist a small gap between current version.

@jtj01
Copy link

jtj01 commented Oct 31, 2024

Hello, I would like to ask, how do you visualize it? I am using the same pre trained model as you. I am unable to visualize it, and I am not sure if the result I ran is incorrect or for some reason. I hope you can help me answer this, thank you very much!
屏幕截图 2024-10-31 142604

@bututoubaobei-0108
Copy link
Author

Nice visualization, how about first check the number metric of testing is matched? The released weight is for PTv3 is with Pointcept v1.5.1. I remember there exist a small gap between current version.

Thank you for the suggestion. I will check it out about the metric value. In addition, do you have the latest version of the model of ptv3 for dataset s3dis?

@bututoubaobei-0108
Copy link
Author

Hello, I would like to ask, how do you visualize it? I am using the same pre trained model as you. I am unable to visualize it, and I am not sure if the result I ran is incorrect or for some reason. I hope you can help me answer this, thank you very much! 屏幕截图 2024-10-31 142604

the output is the label of each point. You should create a file in which you define a color for each label. In this way, each point has its corresponding color, and you can visualize it. I visualize it based on open3d library

@jtj01
Copy link

jtj01 commented Nov 1, 2024

Thank you very much for your reply. I ran it successfully! Thank you!

@Gofinge
Copy link
Member

Gofinge commented Dec 2, 2024

Nice visualization, how about first check the number metric of testing is matched? The released weight is for PTv3 is with Pointcept v1.5.1. I remember there exist a small gap between current version.

Thank you for the suggestion. I will check it out about the metric value. In addition, do you have the latest version of the model of ptv3 for dataset s3dis?

Hi, sorry for the late response, I just recovered from the busy schedule for the CVPR project. I will have a big update a few weeks later. A stronger self-supervised PTv3 and turned weight for S3DIS sem seg will be available in Jan of next year after necessary review process.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants