Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Multi-Image slots #5

Open
stanislavkostadinov opened this issue Mar 31, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

Multi-Image slots #5

stanislavkostadinov opened this issue Mar 31, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@stanislavkostadinov
Copy link
Contributor

I've implemented multi-image slots for the next release. Users can select as many images as they want to see. Images with different size will be aligned to the upper left corner.

I haven't umplemented yet a panel with transparency scrollbar for each image and functionality for rearranging the order of the images.

This functionality is useful when users compare two images of one artefact (e.g. image of painting and semi-transparent x-ray image of the same painting). untitled

@yuricus
Copy link
Contributor

yuricus commented Apr 1, 2016

That's great and I'm looking forward to see it.

There's implementation of this feature in other frameworks (i.e. http://merovingio.c2rmf.cnrs.fr/iipimage/iipmooviewer/vangogh.html), it would be glad to see it here.

@stanislavkostadinov
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've tried to reuse some of the controls from http://165.134.241.141/brokenBooks/getManifest.html
untitled
The problem is that current OSD has opacity property per canvas and I need opacity per tile image (I think this is newer version - https://openseadragon.github.io/docs/OpenSeadragon.Viewer.html#addTiledImage)

@stanislavkostadinov
Copy link
Contributor Author

Initial version of multi-image slots: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mokOyLMlaro

@cbeer cbeer transferred this issue from ProjectMirador/mirador Jun 17, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants