You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@nicholascar has the WG decided on a mechanism for CRS negotiation yet? I read the discussion here w3c/dxwg#311 but I don't there there is any solid agreement on Accept-Crs vs using extensions on Accept-Profile.
I think the feeling is that the WG should just ensure that, as per Requirement 1: Profile negotiation mechanisms must support or safely co-exist with negotiation over other dimensions of data organisation. So the UC indicates constraints on the Profile Negotiation but doesn't call on the WG to actually implement conneg by CRS.
Let's put supporting conneg by CRS within pyLDAPI on the back-burner. It might be something that LOC-I project wants but there's no requirement to support it directly for now.
Add a new conneg dimension: by CRS. Open-ended list of CRSes as URIs.
Motivation: w3c/dxwg#311
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: