You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am very fond of your work on protocol fuzz testing, and I am currently attempting to optimize nyx-net. In nyx-net, the transmission of prefix messages is achieved through taking incremental snapshots.
I have a question: During the fuzz testing process, are there scenarios where the cost of directly sending prefix messages is less than the cost of taking incremental snapshots? Is this phenomenon common?
For instance, if there are 10 prefix messages, would it be faster to place a snapshot after the 8th message and then restore, followed by sending the remaining two messages to reach a certain state, rather than placing a snapshot directly after the 10th message?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am very fond of your work on protocol fuzz testing, and I am currently attempting to optimize nyx-net. In nyx-net, the transmission of prefix messages is achieved through taking incremental snapshots.
I have a question: During the fuzz testing process, are there scenarios where the cost of directly sending prefix messages is less than the cost of taking incremental snapshots? Is this phenomenon common?
For instance, if there are 10 prefix messages, would it be faster to place a snapshot after the 8th message and then restore, followed by sending the remaining two messages to reach a certain state, rather than placing a snapshot directly after the 10th message?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: