Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clear sign broken with 0.93.3 #2665

Closed
AdamB2023 opened this issue Dec 7, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

Clear sign broken with 0.93.3 #2665

AdamB2023 opened this issue Dec 7, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@AdamB2023
Copy link

Rabby browser extension 0.93.3 broken clear sign.
Sending USDT on BEP20 result in blind sign.
It worked correctly with 0.93.1.

@0x398
Copy link

0x398 commented Dec 7, 2024

@AdamB2023 they've just silently disabled it again, even have not mentioned this huge regressions in the release notes. Beats me why they keep doing this instead of fixing stuff, so annoying!
#2661

@vvvvvv1vvvvvv
Copy link
Member

Clear Signing caused a lot of bugs. Within two weeks of enabling it, we received hundreds of cases of signature failures caused by Clear Signing, so we had to disable it. We have reported all the problems to the Ledger team and are waiting for them to fix them. If Clear Signing no longer has bugs, we will re-enable it.

@vvvvvv1vvvvvv
Copy link
Member

telegram-cloud-photo-size-5-6240050696531590955-x
telegram-cloud-photo-size-5-6240050696531590954-y
telegram-cloud-photo-size-5-6211007023869443805-y
telegram-cloud-photo-size-5-6211007023869443807-y

If you strongly want to use Clear Signing and don't care about potential problems, you can use the previous version of Rabby (download here https://github.com/RabbyHub/Rabby/releases/tag/v0.93.2)

@AdamB2023
Copy link
Author

So you're saying Clear Sign caused bugs, now you disabled it and the bugs you provided on screenshots are still here.
image
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants