You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
sean-k-mooney
sure but if you were doing a certifcation examp and the question was what is a nova AZ. then you shoudl recive 0 marks for sayign its a fault domain
(...)
if you say "its a nova api constract that allows you to group hosts for schdulign to enable uscases such as locality, or fault domains." then you get full marks
(...)
on thing to conserd is there is not expctation that a Nova AZ maps to the same set of host as a cidner or neutron AZ
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Maybe use the wording from Greg Procunier on the same thread
Greg Procunier
Sean, does the nova/compute team have a reference or abstract that captures what you have been speaking of from the perspective is "this is a highly resilient deployment (from the perspective of compute)"
Greg Procunier
with the understanding of fault resilient != fault tolerant (edited)
AZ was a bad name. It's basically nova only and do not produce a failure domain, by itself. See slack discussion at
https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/C0YDMFY2G/p1714411844090559?thread_ts=1713999141.099059&cid=C0YDMFY2G
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: