You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would to request enhancing Flux Domain Manager to allow the user to select the type of proxy they want to use when deploying an app on Flux.
Currently the proxy for Flux Domain Manager hides the IP addresses of the instances behind the proxy/load balancer and causes problems for Game Clients and VPN clients when those clients attempt to connect to the hostname generated from FDM.
What I propose is that we add support for "transparent proxies" where one of the IP address would selected from the LB pool and made known to the Game or VPN client. Instead of the IP from the load balancing server.
I highly suggest that you add to the FluxOS UI the ability for the end user to select whether they want FDM to put their app behind a "proxy that does not hide the IPs of the servers" or a "proxy that hides the IPs of the servers)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I would to request enhancing Flux Domain Manager to allow the user to select the type of proxy they want to use when deploying an app on Flux.
Currently the proxy for Flux Domain Manager hides the IP addresses of the instances behind the proxy/load balancer and causes problems for Game Clients and VPN clients when those clients attempt to connect to the hostname generated from FDM.
What I propose is that we add support for "transparent proxies" where one of the IP address would selected from the LB pool and made known to the Game or VPN client. Instead of the IP from the load balancing server.
I highly suggest that you add to the FluxOS UI the ability for the end user to select whether they want FDM to put their app behind a "proxy that does not hide the IPs of the servers" or a "proxy that hides the IPs of the servers)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: