You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Very good work! I have a question about the motivation for the experimental analysis: the evaluation of the optimal scheme involves data leakage, which seems bound to lead to significantly superior performance, so why not adopt a fairer comparison scheme? For example, directly measuring the distribution differences of time series.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
One motivation is that prior works including FSNet and OneNet just adopted the optimal scheme with data leakage. We would like to reveal the overestimation of their methods by comparing them with the actual performance under the practical scheme. We argue that we should not rely only on forecasting feedback on recent ground truth.
Very good work! I have a question about the motivation for the experimental analysis: the evaluation of the optimal scheme involves data leakage, which seems bound to lead to significantly superior performance, so why not adopt a fairer comparison scheme? For example, directly measuring the distribution differences of time series.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: