You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
i just switched over from using the binary sensor door (ha_mqtt_binary_sensor_door) over to use the multisensor (ha_mqtt_multisensor) for the same propose plus more (pir sensor)
I found some difference:
magnet/reed/door sensor with the same wiring (d1 and ground) results:
binary sensor: works like a charm
multi sensor: also works but open/closed is now vice versa?
button with same wiring (wemos button shield on d3 and ground) without any resistor:
binary sensor: button press forces reboot of the esp board
multi sensor: works like a charm here
And the pir/motion sensor on the multi sensor sketch also works like a charm.
Beside that I like the "online" state information from the multi sensor! Very nice feature!
Would be awesome to "tune" the multisensor sketch that it's possible to use more/different types of sensor. For example:
Like the idea! Having the multi sensor with modules you can choose and wire your hardware! 👍
pidiet
changed the title
binary sensor door/button VS multi sensor door/button
Help: binary sensor door/button VS multi sensor door/button
Apr 13, 2018
Hello,
i just switched over from using the binary sensor door (ha_mqtt_binary_sensor_door) over to use the multisensor (ha_mqtt_multisensor) for the same propose plus more (pir sensor)
I found some difference:
magnet/reed/door sensor with the same wiring (d1 and ground) results:
button with same wiring (wemos button shield on d3 and ground) without any resistor:
And the pir/motion sensor on the multi sensor sketch also works like a charm.
Beside that I like the "online" state information from the multi sensor! Very nice feature!
Would be awesome to "tune" the multisensor sketch that it's possible to use more/different types of sensor. For example:
Any idea how I can correct my open/closed problem with the my door sensor? Thank's!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: