-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Possible inconsistency in Poly_GaussCoil model (Trac #364) #499
Comments
Trac update at The poly_m parameter is related to the width of the chain length distribution (if poly_m=0 all chains are the same length). Clearly the chain length has a bearing on Rg since Rg=(n+1)^-2 ^x [SUM(i,j<n) (Rij)^2^] where Rij is the distance between the i'th and j'th atoms in the chain. This is the basis of Klaus' point. However, the chain length distribution does not specify the conformational freedom of the chains; chains of the same length could have different Rg's (consider swollen vs collapsed coils). So I would argue that you CAN have a distribution of Rg's as well. |
Trac update at While I agree that Steve is correct that Rg is affected by more than the Molecular weight distribution, I Think Klaus is correct in the sense that a polydispersity added to Rg would be 100% correlated to the poly_m parameter (and would be like fitting both the scale and sld difference). That said the question I suppose is whehter we prevent Rg from having polidispersity added or not. I note that we do not prevent people from letting scale and delta(sld) vary simultaneously.... which in turn goes back to th philosophical discussion of how much you actively prevent people from doing what you think is wrong vs just warning - with respect to "warning" we can add that to the documnentation for sure! |
Trac update at |
Trac update at |
Trac update at
Suggest we add some notes along these lines to the model documentation and close this ticket. As such it becomes part of the verify all model documentation core activity of release 4.0 and thus moving to this to blocker.
|
Trac update at
|
Trac update at
|
Trac update at
The sasmodels implementation of this model does not in fact allow for polydispersity on Rg at the moment as it was re-written by Steve King. If he enables PD on the Rg he will change the documentation to reflect that. Thus this ticket is essentially addressed for now.
|
Klaus Huber has noted that the polydisperse Gaussian coil model (in the shape independent category) contains already a model parameter (poly_m) that is related to the polydispersity. Therefore he considers that the user should
not have the option to activate also the polydispersity for the radius of gyration.
Migrated from http://trac.sasview.org/ticket/364
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: