-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 313
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug: launch single stack with !stack_output and --ignore-dependencies
#778
Comments
ngfgrant
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 4, 2019
This commit fixes an issue where a users attempts to launch a single stack that utilises the `stack_output_resolver` with the `--ignore-dependencies`. Previously, with `--ignore-dependencies` set, any dependencies that arose through `!stack_output_resolver` would not be added to `stack.dependencies` and the `next()` function in `StackOutput.resolve()` would raise a `StopIteration` as the stack.dependencies list would be empty. This commit handles the stack_output by utilising the argument passed into `stack_output`. [Resolves #778]
9 tasks
ngfgrant
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 4, 2019
This commit fixes an issue where a users attempts to launch a single stack that utilises the `stack_output_resolver` with the `--ignore-dependencies`. Previously, with `--ignore-dependencies` set, any dependencies that arose through `!stack_output_resolver` would not be added to `stack.dependencies` and the `next()` function in `StackOutput.resolve()` would raise a `StopIteration` as the stack.dependencies list would be empty. This commit handles the stack_output by utilising the argument passed into `stack_output`. [Resolves #778]
chhibber
pushed a commit
to chhibber/sceptre
that referenced
this issue
Aug 20, 2019
This commit fixes an issue where a users attempts to launch a single stack that utilises the `stack_output_resolver` with the `--ignore-dependencies`. Previously, with `--ignore-dependencies` set, any dependencies that arose through `!stack_output_resolver` would not be added to `stack.dependencies` and the `next()` function in `StackOutput.resolve()` would raise a `StopIteration` as the stack.dependencies list would be empty. This commit handles the stack_output by utilising the argument passed into `stack_output`. [Resolves Sceptre#778]
chhibber
pushed a commit
to chhibber/sceptre
that referenced
this issue
Aug 20, 2019
This commit fixes an issue where a users attempts to launch a single stack that utilises the `stack_output_resolver` with the `--ignore-dependencies`. Previously, with `--ignore-dependencies` set, any dependencies that arose through `!stack_output_resolver` would not be added to `stack.dependencies` and the `next()` function in `StackOutput.resolve()` would raise a `StopIteration` as the stack.dependencies list would be empty. This commit handles the stack_output by utilising the argument passed into `stack_output`. [Resolves Sceptre#778]
any progress on this? would say that is better to have the constrain of the region that it break? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
There is an issue where a users attempts to launch a single stack that utilises the
stack_output_resolver
with the--ignore-dependencies
.With
--ignore-dependencies
set, any dependencies that arise through!stack_output_resolver
would not be added tostack.dependencies
and thenext()
function inStackOutput.resolve()
would raise aStopIteration
as the stack.dependencies list would be empty.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: