You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is the upper bound correct? Why was is nr_int-2 before?
-> Was this preventing that the radial smoother is empty?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
mknaranja
changed the title
Circle to radial smoother argument is takes values from line i-1
Circle to radial smoother argument takes values from line i-1
Jun 16, 2023
In https://github.com/mknaranja/GMGPolar/blob/25cd29f5926df0fb05e6ca15a66a714694d6920d/src/smoother.cpp#L80
we want to check
q*r>1
as derived in (4.4) of https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10915-022-01802-1. However, with the previous line, we actually checkk/h_{i-1}*r_i>1
instead ofk/h_{i}*r_i>1
. I think this should be corrected.I think the correct solution is:
Thanks to @CodingAllan for reporting. What do you think @chrissy-s96 and @Philou31 ?
Is the upper bound correct? Why was is
nr_int-2
before?-> Was this preventing that the radial smoother is empty?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: