Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add disclaimer that optimize-than-discretize adjoints for SDE run in O(n^2) #916

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 17, 2023

Conversation

linusheck
Copy link
Contributor

...until issue #854 is solved. Otherwise, people would maybe waste time trying to use this method even though its implementation is currently not efficient.

@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit a2ef2a7 into SciML:master Oct 17, 2023
1 check was pending
@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

@frankschae were you going to look into it?

@frankschae
Copy link
Member

Yes, I could do that. We should maybe discuss once, before I do it, what other changes might be useful for StochasticDiffEq (e.g. diagonal noise as vector -> diagonal matrix? or SciML/StochasticDiffEq.jl#472?).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants