Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

consider using IAO:definition #11

Open
mjy opened this issue Dec 12, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

consider using IAO:definition #11

mjy opened this issue Dec 12, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@mjy
Copy link
Member

mjy commented Dec 12, 2018

"You might also consider using IAO:definition instead, which is conventionally used across OBO ontologies for giving the definition of a term." via #7
@mdoering
Copy link

Some documentation would be good to have. I am not very OWL experienced to know how to best document OWL classes. But having some human text to understand semantics would be very helpful

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@mjy @mdoering