Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No rdfs:isDefinedBy annotations #15

Open
hlapp opened this issue Dec 13, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

No rdfs:isDefinedBy annotations #15

hlapp opened this issue Dec 13, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@hlapp
Copy link
Contributor

hlapp commented Dec 13, 2018

NOMEN terms lack rdfs:isDefinedBy annotations. From your perspective they don't add that much if anything, but they're very useful if an ontology is synthesized from different source ontologies and vocabularies, because it maintains a link back to where a term was originally defined and presumably was thus conceived of, in a way that's both human and machine readable and follow-able.

I've had to add those manually for the few hundred NOMEN terms I'm reusing in the TCAN (Taxon Concepts and Names) ontology. It'd be nice if on a future rebuild they came along already with an extract from NOMEN.

@hlapp
Copy link
Contributor Author

hlapp commented Dec 18, 2018

Or maybe I'm giving the wrong advice here. See OBOFoundry/OBOFoundry.github.io#806.

@mjy
Copy link
Member

mjy commented Oct 27, 2023

Adding this here for recent conversation inquiring about definitions.

There are 3 ways to infer a definition.

  1. Class hierarchy. This is pretty straightforward. An ICZN available name is a symbol, a biological name, a scientific name. See rdfs:comment for additional definition at some levels.
Screenshot 2023-10-27 at 1 43 39 PM
  1. Crossreferences and class metadata. See things like Zoonom_ARK, GBIF status, code applicability start/end date.
Screenshot 2023-10-27 at 1 43 31 PM
  1. Most critical, pointers to the definintion in the Code itself. E.g. ICZN arictle
Screenshot 2023-10-27 at 1 43 27 PM

See also the presentations folder herein

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants