You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We're working on BIDS Enhancement Proposal 32 (BEP32) bids-standard/bids-specification#1705 which requires probe layout specification capabilities. After evaluating ProbeInterface for this purpose, we've considered three approaches:
Referencing ProbeInterface atlases directly
Including ProbeInterface JSON files within datasets
Adding ProbeInterface-inspired columns to existing electrodes.tsv and probes.tsv tables
We've decided to proceed with option 3 as it best aligns with BIDS' existing layout, form, and infrastructure. Moving forward, we'd like to develop bidirectional conversion utilities between ProbeInterface JSON files and the BIDS columnar structure.
While we're actively developing this on the BIDS side, we're still determining the best location for the conversion code. It might be sufficient to simply reference the BIDS implementation in the ProbeInterface documentation.
I'm creating this issue primarily to keep the ProbeInterface development team informed of these developments and potential future integration needs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We're working on BIDS Enhancement Proposal 32 (BEP32) bids-standard/bids-specification#1705 which requires probe layout specification capabilities. After evaluating ProbeInterface for this purpose, we've considered three approaches:
We've decided to proceed with option 3 as it best aligns with BIDS' existing layout, form, and infrastructure. Moving forward, we'd like to develop bidirectional conversion utilities between ProbeInterface JSON files and the BIDS columnar structure.
While we're actively developing this on the BIDS side, we're still determining the best location for the conversion code. It might be sufficient to simply reference the BIDS implementation in the ProbeInterface documentation.
I'm creating this issue primarily to keep the ProbeInterface development team informed of these developments and potential future integration needs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: