Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BEP032 support #309

Open
bendichter opened this issue Nov 30, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

BEP032 support #309

bendichter opened this issue Nov 30, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@bendichter
Copy link
Contributor

We're working on BIDS Enhancement Proposal 32 (BEP32) bids-standard/bids-specification#1705 which requires probe layout specification capabilities. After evaluating ProbeInterface for this purpose, we've considered three approaches:

  1. Referencing ProbeInterface atlases directly
  2. Including ProbeInterface JSON files within datasets
  3. Adding ProbeInterface-inspired columns to existing electrodes.tsv and probes.tsv tables

We've decided to proceed with option 3 as it best aligns with BIDS' existing layout, form, and infrastructure. Moving forward, we'd like to develop bidirectional conversion utilities between ProbeInterface JSON files and the BIDS columnar structure.

While we're actively developing this on the BIDS side, we're still determining the best location for the conversion code. It might be sufficient to simply reference the BIDS implementation in the ProbeInterface documentation.
I'm creating this issue primarily to keep the ProbeInterface development team informed of these developments and potential future integration needs.

@samuelgarcia
Copy link
Member

Hi Ben,
thanks for the update.
Please also notes that we have a bids BEP32 reader in spikeinterface here : https://github.com/SpikeInterface/spikeinterface/blob/main/src/spikeinterface/extractors/bids.py
it was implemented a while ago and we should certainly update it!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants