-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 852
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Stellarium for ARM #1381
Comments
Thanks for adding your first issue to Stellarium. If you have questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. |
Just follow build instructions for Linux. |
I can write a recipe for appimage and update bash script for building an appimage from the recipe, but... I don’t have ARM (I think you meant aarch64 architecture) device for building package. |
I am willing to test and build it, just for fun |
Thanks, but what about architecture details? Could you share result of running |
@edegraaff please install prerequisite packages (see https://github.com/Stellarium/stellarium/blob/master/BUILDING.md#debian--ubuntu), get the source code from git and check the script |
eelco@pi4:~$ uname -m |
@edegraaff could you test |
Maybe you need to cross-compile a new kit for aarch64. |
Please test those packages (see artifacts section): https://github.com/Stellarium/stellarium/actions/runs/390046411 |
hi i am builing an new machine image with usb disk. the sd card was to small... i.will.get bet to you later this week when the system is rrady with enough resources to compile |
I prepared an AppImage - just test it :) |
i will this evening great i am curious |
root@pi4:/home/eelco/Downloads# ./Stellarium-edge-aarch64.AppImage root@pi4:/home/eelco/Downloads/Stellarium-edge-armv7# ./Stellarium-edge-armhf.AppImage |
Thanks!
This is very strange. :(
This is OK for aarch64 |
@edegraaff could you check package |
Probably this workaround could help you: |
|
link: cannot create link '/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libz.so' to '/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1': File exists |
This is weird... what about |
Possible workaround 1: Possible workaround 2: |
darn both where already installed and the latest version |
@edegraaff any news? @gzotti could you test it on your RPi? |
I am still out of town. Maybe next week. |
I did test it, see respond above both options where tested, and both where already installed and the latest version :-( grrr |
This is a good task for the community to participate in the contribution into Stellarium. Who wants to help us? |
What is the benefit of using an AppImage on a RPi? We support building and running out of the box on RPi4 and RPi3B+. |
Not all linux for RPi support the deb packages… |
But all RPi distros which have Qt5 available in some format (via own package manager or even self-compiled for the masochists) should allow building on-board, maybe with omissions (QtWebengine may not be available). Uncommon distros are usually used for special purposes, not to run astronomical applications. I understand the AppImage packs all required libraries again, so IMHO it's a waste of space on the small SD cards. That said, What would I do to install and run such AppImage for a test? I have Raspbian/Buster in RPi3 and Ubuntu Mate 22.04 on my RPi4. |
This is a good task for the community to participate in the contribution into Stellarium. Who wants to help us? |
I’m stopped the preparation of the AppImages for ARM, but you can play with it: https://github.com/Stellarium/stellarium/actions/workflows/appimage-arm.yml P.S. I’m don’t have ARM-hardware, like RPi, for testing - maximum - QEMU |
We have a strong reason not to do it! Some reasons for it can be found in the FAQ: |
The problem is outside of Stellarium and we cannot prepare runnable AppImage for ARM devices |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Hi, since there is a Pi4 with plenty memory, and ubuntu 64 bits for arm, i am experimenting with appimages
Describe the solution you'd like
Is it possible to build appimages for pi arm 64 ubunto architecture?
Describe alternatives you've considered
It is possible to use the normal installer, but appimage seems nice, but seems also to have special demands to the platform
Additional context
none
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: