Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue with Astronomical Calculations: Ephemeris Showing Unrealistic Magnitude for Uranus #3634

Closed
Yogurt84 opened this issue Feb 18, 2024 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Milestone

Comments

@Yogurt84
Copy link

Yogurt84 commented Feb 18, 2024

Expected Behaviour

"Astronomical calculations" (Ephemeris) estimates the magnitude of Uranus within a rage of [5.38, 6.03].
This range was sorced from Wikipedia.

Actual Behaviour

"Astronomical calculations" (Ephemeris) sometimes predict a magnitude of Uranus greater than 10.

  • 10.10 at 2030-02-18 01:52:02
  • 10.90 at 2069-02-18 01:49:23

Steps to reproduce

  1. Open "Astronomical calculations" window
  2. Open "Ephemeris" tab
  3. Select Uranus in "Celestial body" option
  4. From: 2024.02.18 12:57:03 To: 2074.03.18 12:57:03 // Perhaps time setting is critical.
  5. Time step: 1 sidereal year
  6. Select "magnitudes" checkbox
  7. Click "Calculate ephemeris"

System

  • Stellarium version: stellarium-23.4-qt6-win64.exe
  • Operating system: Windows10 Version 22H2 OS build 19045.4046
  • Graphics Card: NVidia, GeForce GTX 960, 537.13
  • Screen type (if applicable):

Logfile

log.txt

@alex-w
Copy link
Member

alex-w commented Feb 18, 2024

Ephemeris tool in "Astronomical calculations" dialog show magnitudes with air mass correction (refraction and extintion effects), so, magnitude of Uranus near horizon will be dimmer than in some height. Of course when Uranus under horizon you will see probably "strange" magnitudes (depends on selected algorithm for refraction/extintion under horizon). To avoid these effects, just disable an atmosphere and compute the ephemeris again.

@alex-w alex-w added the opinion OP thinks something should behave differently label Feb 18, 2024
@gzotti gzotti closed this as completed in 00def79 Feb 18, 2024
@gzotti
Copy link
Member

gzotti commented Feb 18, 2024

I just added a note to the Guide on that.

@alex-w alex-w added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Feb 18, 2024
@alex-w
Copy link
Member

alex-w commented Feb 18, 2024

@gzotti adding tooltip for magnitudes when atmosphere on maybe helpful also

@alex-w alex-w added this to the 24.1 milestone Feb 18, 2024
@gzotti
Copy link
Member

gzotti commented Feb 18, 2024

Ideed. But it's not only atmosphere. If s.o. compares with almanac, we apply topocentric correction, aberration etc. if so set. I will try to find a short formulation.

Copy link

Thank you for suggesting documentation improvement.

gzotti added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 18, 2024
@alex-w alex-w added the state: published The fix has been published for testing in weekly binary package label Feb 25, 2024
Copy link

Hello @Yogurt84!

Please check the fresh version (development snapshot) of Stellarium:
https://github.com/Stellarium/stellarium-data/releases/tag/weekly-snapshot

@alex-w alex-w removed the opinion OP thinks something should behave differently label Feb 25, 2024
@alex-w alex-w removed the state: published The fix has been published for testing in weekly binary package label Mar 26, 2024
Copy link

Hello @Yogurt84!

Please check the latest stable version of Stellarium:
https://github.com/Stellarium/stellarium/releases/latest

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants