Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lunar occultation timings off? #4079

Closed
JanHatt opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 3 comments
Closed

Lunar occultation timings off? #4079

JanHatt opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 3 comments
Labels
state: outdated Outdated problems

Comments

@JanHatt
Copy link

JanHatt commented Jan 14, 2025

Expected Behaviour

Timing of ingress & egress of occultations of stars and planets should be accurate within a few seconds.

Actual Behaviour

Recent occultation ingress timings of Saturn, Mars and stars were off beween ~40-60 seconds compared to actual observations, even after checking that the observing location was correct and clock used for timing NTP synchronized.

More specifically, ingress time of 8.1 mag star on 2025/01/11 was predicted for 20:43:04 UTC, 41s earlier than actual observation.
Start and end of Mars ingress on 20250114 was predicted 04:10:37 and 04:11:13 UTC, 51 seconds/ 57 seconds earlier than observation.

Observation was at 28°46'18.59" N 17°57'33,96", 1000 asl.

Steps to reproduce

System

  • Stellarium version: 0.21.1
  • Operating system: Linux Mint 20 Cinnamon
  • Graphics Card: Intel 2nd Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics
  • Screen type

Logfile

If possible, attach the logfile log.txt from your user data directory. Look into the Guide for its location.

@Atque
Copy link
Contributor

Atque commented Jan 14, 2025

Please update to 24.4 and check the results. Stellarium was less accurate in 2021.

@gzotti
Copy link
Member

gzotti commented Jan 14, 2025

0.21 is indeed too old to discuss here. Dropping the zero had a reason :-) However, another problem is the geometry of the lunar sphere as tessellated "disco ball", which means the edge may be inside the actual diameter. See the according attempted PR #1959.

@gzotti gzotti added the state: outdated Outdated problems label Jan 14, 2025
Copy link

This report is outdated, such, the problematic code replaced by new tool or feature...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
state: outdated Outdated problems
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants