-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Restrict comment_author to name fields #1945
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Restrict comment_author to name fields #1945
Conversation
WalkthroughThe change introduces a new private static variable Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested reviewers
Warning Rate limit exceeded@AbdiTolesa has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 7 minutes and 29 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
@truongwp I accidentally took over your task as it was in my list and I thought I didn't notice it was unassigned from me. 😄 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @AbdiTolesa so much! I haven't started working on this issue. This looks good.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
tests/phpunit/entries/test_FrmEntryValidate.php (1)
58-59
: Commented out assertions forcomment_author_email
andcomment_author_url
are not tested elsewhere.The assertions for
comment_author_email
andcomment_author_url
are commented out and not covered in other parts of the test suite. If these fields are still relevant, consider re-enabling the tests or ensuring they are tested in another way.Analysis chain
Commented out assertions for
comment_author_email
andcomment_author_url
.These assertions have been commented out, possibly due to changes in the focus of the test. It's important to ensure that these fields are still appropriately tested elsewhere if they remain relevant.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the tests for `comment_author_email` and `comment_author_url` are covered elsewhere in the test suite. # Test: Search for assertions related to `comment_author_email` and `comment_author_url` in other tests. rg --type php -A 5 $'assertEquals.*comment_author_email|assertEquals.*comment_author_url'Length of output: 2042
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @AbdiTolesa and @truongwp for working on this!
I think this should be good to go for next release.
🚀
…tps://github.com/Strategy11/formidable-forms into issue-1781-restrict_comment_author_to_name_field
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
classes/models/FrmEntryValidate.php (4)
8-13
: Complete the PHPDoc comment for the new property.The PHPDoc comment for the new
$name_text_fields
property is incomplete. Consider adding a description to explain its purpose and usage.Here's a suggested improvement:
/** * @since x.x - * + * Stores cached name text fields to avoid repeated database queries. * @var array|null */ private static $name_text_fields;
Line range hint
593-613
: Approve changes and update PHPDoc.The addition of the
$values
parameter tois_akismet_guest_info_value
method enhances its capability to perform more comprehensive spam checks. This aligns well with the PR objectives.Consider updating the PHPDoc for the method to include the new
$values
parameter:/** * Checks if given value is an akismet guest info. * * @since 5.0.13 * * @param string $key Guest info key. * @param string $value Value to check. * @param int $field_id Field ID. * @param array $name_field_ids Name field IDs. + * @param array $values Array of posted values. * * @return bool */
Line range hint
616-648
: Approve changes and address inconsistent use ofabsint()
.The new logic for handling the 'comment_author' case improves the accuracy of determining the comment author by specifically looking for Name fields. This aligns well with the PR objectives.
There's an inconsistency in the use of
absint()
when accessing array values. On line 641,absint()
is used, but on line 644, it's not. For consistency and to prevent potential issues with non-integer keys, consider usingabsint()
in both cases:-if ( empty( $values[ absint( $fields[ $index + 1 ]->id ) ] ) ) { +if ( empty( $values[ absint( $fields[ $index + 1 ]->id ) ] ) ) { continue; } -$value .= ' ' . $values[ $fields[ $index + 1 ]->id ]; +$value .= ' ' . $values[ absint( $fields[ $index + 1 ]->id ) ]; return true;
653-679
: Approve new method and improve PHPDoc.The addition of the
get_name_text_fields
method is a good improvement. It efficiently retrieves and caches name text fields, which aligns with the PR objectives and enhances performance.Consider improving the PHPDoc comment for the method by adding a description and specifying the return value:
/** - * Returns fields that have 'Name' and 'Last' as their name. + * Retrieves and caches text fields that have 'Name' and 'Last' as their name. + * This method helps in identifying the appropriate fields for the comment_author parameter. * * @since x.x * * @param int $form_id - * @return array + * @return array An array of objects containing field id and name for 'Name' and 'Last' text fields. */
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- classes/models/FrmEntryValidate.php (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
classes/models/FrmEntryValidate.php (1)
Line range hint
8-679
: Overall assessment of changes.The modifications made to the
FrmEntryValidate
class significantly improve the handling of thecomment_author
parameter for Akismet spam checks. The changes align well with the PR objectives and enhance both accuracy and performance. Key improvements include:
- Better identification and handling of Name fields for the
comment_author
parameter.- Improved performance through caching of name text fields.
- More comprehensive spam checking by considering additional context (all posted values).
These changes should result in more accurate spam detection while maintaining good performance. The code is well-structured and follows good practices, with only minor suggestions for improvement in documentation and consistency.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
classes/models/FrmEntryValidate.php (1)
Line range hint
616-648
: Improve robustness of name field handling.Several issues in the name field handling logic:
- The method modifies
$value
but this isn't clear from the method signature.- Potential null pointer when accessing
$fields[$index + 1]
.- Inconsistent use of
absint()
when accessing array values.Consider these improvements:
-private static function is_akismet_guest_info_value( $key, &$value, $field_id, $name_field_ids, $values ) { +private static function is_akismet_guest_info_value( $key, &$value, $field_id, $name_field_ids, $values ) { // ... existing code ... case 'comment_author': if ( $name_field_ids && in_array( $field_id, $name_field_ids, true ) ) { return true; } $form_id = FrmAppHelper::get_post_param( 'form_id', 0, 'absint' ); $fields = self::get_name_text_fields( $form_id ); foreach ( $fields as $index => $field ) { if ( 'Name' !== $field->name ) { continue; } - if ( isset( $fields[ $index + 1 ] ) && 'Last' === $fields[ $index + 1 ]->name ) { - if ( empty( $values[ absint( $fields[ $index + 1 ]->id ) ] ) ) { + $next_index = $index + 1; + if ( ! isset( $fields[ $next_index ] ) || 'Last' !== $fields[ $next_index ]->name ) { + continue; + } + + $last_name_field_id = absint( $fields[ $next_index ]->id ); + if ( empty( $values[ $last_name_field_id ] ) ) { continue; } - $value .= ' ' . $values[ $fields[ $index + 1 ]->id ]; + $value .= ' ' . $values[ $last_name_field_id ]; return true; } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
classes/models/FrmEntryValidate.php
(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
classes/models/FrmEntryValidate.php (1)
593-593
: Verify the impact of passing values by reference.
The is_akismet_guest_info_value
method modifies the $value
parameter, which could have unintended side effects in the recursive function call.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about the implementation of is_akismet_guest_info_value
to understand how it modifies the value parameter.
Let me try a different approach to get the implementation details.
Pass-by-reference modification is safe in this context
The is_akismet_guest_info_value
method only modifies the $value
parameter in one specific case - when handling the 'comment_author' key and appending a last name value. This modification is intentional and properly handled:
- The modified
$value
is immediately used in$datas[$key] = $value
after the function call - The modification only concatenates values to create a full name
- The scope is limited to the akismet guest info processing
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other usages of is_akismet_guest_info_value to understand the impact
# of modifying the $value parameter.
# Search for method calls
rg "is_akismet_guest_info_value" -A 5
# Search for similar patterns of passing values by reference
ast-grep --pattern 'function $name(&$value)'
Length of output: 989
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the full implementation of is_akismet_guest_info_value
rg -U "private static function is_akismet_guest_info_value.*?\n}$" -A 50 classes/models/FrmEntryValidate.php
# Check if the value is used elsewhere after modification
rg "\$value\s*=" -A 2 classes/models/FrmEntryValidate.php
Length of output: 169
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the content of the file to analyze the implementation
cat classes/models/FrmEntryValidate.php | grep -A 50 "is_akismet_guest_info_value"
# Look for any modifications to the $value parameter
rg "(&\$value)" classes/models/FrmEntryValidate.php
Length of output: 2257
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
classes/models/FrmEntryValidate.php (3)
8-13
: Enhance docblock documentation for clarity.The docblock should include the array structure details to improve code maintainability.
/** * @since x.x - * - * @var array|null + * Cache for name text fields, indexed by form ID. + * + * @var array { + * @type array $form_id Array of field objects with properties 'id' and 'name'. + * }|null */
Line range hint
616-648
: Add safety checks for array access and improve code structure.The current implementation has a few areas for improvement:
- Direct array access without isset() check on line 644
- Complex nested conditionals could be simplified
Apply this diff to improve safety and readability:
private static function is_akismet_guest_info_value( $key, &$value, $field_id, $name_field_ids, $values ) { if ( ! $value || is_numeric( $value ) ) { return false; } switch ( $key ) { case 'comment_author_email': return strpos( $value, '@' ) && is_email( $value ); case 'comment_author_url': return 0 === strpos( $value, 'http' ); case 'comment_author': if ( $name_field_ids && in_array( $field_id, $name_field_ids, true ) ) { return true; } $form_id = FrmAppHelper::get_post_param( 'form_id', 0, 'absint' ); $fields = self::get_name_text_fields( $form_id ); - foreach ( $fields as $index => $field ) { - if ( 'Name' !== $field->name ) { - continue; - } - if ( isset( $fields[ $index + 1 ] ) && 'Last' === $fields[ $index + 1 ]->name ) { - if ( empty( $values[ absint( $fields[ $index + 1 ]->id ) ] ) ) { - continue; - } - $value .= ' ' . $values[ $fields[ $index + 1 ]->id ]; - return true; - } - } + $field_count = count($fields); + for ( $i = 0; $i < $field_count - 1; $i++ ) { + if ( 'Name' !== $fields[$i]->name || 'Last' !== $fields[$i + 1]->name ) { + continue; + } + + $last_field_id = absint($fields[$i + 1]->id); + if ( empty($values[$last_field_id]) ) { + continue; + } + + $value .= ' ' . $values[$last_field_id]; + return true; + } } return false; }
653-680
: Well-structured caching implementation with room for minor improvements.The implementation effectively caches database results per form ID. Consider adding a method to clear the cache when fields are modified.
Consider adding a cache clearing method:
/** * Clears the name text fields cache. * * @since x.x * * @param int|null $form_id Optional. The form ID to clear cache for. */ private static function clear_name_text_fields_cache( $form_id = null ) { if ( $form_id ) { unset( self::$name_text_fields[ $form_id ] ); return; } self::$name_text_fields = array(); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
classes/models/FrmEntryValidate.php
(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
classes/models/FrmEntryValidate.php (1)
Line range hint 593-680
: Implementation successfully addresses PR objectives.
The changes effectively restrict the comment_author
parameter to proper name fields while maintaining good performance through caching. The implementation handles both:
- Single name fields (through
name_field_ids
) - First/Last name field combinations
Let's verify the implementation handles all name field scenarios:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can verify that the implementation correctly handles all name field scenarios. The key findings:
-
The code properly handles both single name fields through
name_field_ids
array and first/last name combinations through theName
andLast
field pattern. -
The caching implementation (
self::$name_text_fields
) is correctly used to store and retrieve name fields per form. -
The field type is properly registered and handled through
FrmFieldName
class with appropriate field options. -
The test files confirm proper handling of both scenarios:
// From tests/phpunit/entries/test_FrmEntryValidate.php
// Test "Name" + "Last" field name pattern to build the comment_author
$first_name_id = $this->factory->field->create(
$last_name_id = $this->factory->field->create(
Implementation successfully addresses all name field scenarios
The code correctly:
- Handles single name fields through
name_field_ids
array - Supports first/last name combinations by detecting adjacent "Name" and "Last" fields
- Uses caching for performance optimization
- Has test coverage for both scenarios
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify name field handling scenarios
# Test 1: Check for existing forms using name fields
rg -A 2 "type.*=.*'text'.*name.*=.*('Name'|'Last')"
# Test 2: Check for potential edge cases in field naming
rg -i "name.*field" --type php
Length of output: 59264
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
classes/models/FrmEntryValidate.php (3)
8-13
: Update version number in docblock.The
@since x.x
needs to be updated with the actual version number where this change will be released.
Line range hint
616-648
: Improve robustness of name field handling.The name field concatenation logic has several areas for improvement:
- Add null check before accessing next field's properties
- Use consistent array key sanitization
- Consider restructuring with early returns
Apply this diff to improve the code:
private static function is_akismet_guest_info_value( $key, &$value, $field_id, $name_field_ids, $values ) { if ( ! $value || is_numeric( $value ) ) { return false; } switch ( $key ) { case 'comment_author_email': return strpos( $value, '@' ) && is_email( $value ); case 'comment_author_url': return 0 === strpos( $value, 'http' ); case 'comment_author': if ( $name_field_ids && in_array( $field_id, $name_field_ids, true ) ) { return true; } $form_id = FrmAppHelper::get_post_param( 'form_id', 0, 'absint' ); $fields = self::get_name_text_fields( $form_id ); foreach ( $fields as $index => $field ) { if ( 'Name' !== $field->name ) { continue; } $next_field = isset( $fields[ $index + 1 ] ) ? $fields[ $index + 1 ] : null; if ( ! $next_field || 'Last' !== $next_field->name ) { continue; } $next_field_id = absint( $next_field->id ); if ( empty( $values[ $next_field_id ] ) ) { continue; } $value .= ' ' . $values[ $next_field_id ]; return true; } break; } return false; }
661-681
: Optimize caching implementation and field filtering.The caching logic can be simplified and the field filtering can be more specific:
- Simplify cache initialization check
- Add field format check to ensure we only get plain text fields
Apply this diff to improve the implementation:
private static function get_name_text_fields( $form_id ) { - $name_text_fields_is_initialized = is_array( self::$name_text_fields ); - if ( $name_text_fields_is_initialized && isset( self::$name_text_fields[ $form_id ] ) ) { + if ( isset( self::$name_text_fields ) && isset( self::$name_text_fields[ $form_id ] ) ) { return self::$name_text_fields[ $form_id ]; } - if ( ! $name_text_fields_is_initialized ) { + if ( ! isset( self::$name_text_fields ) ) { self::$name_text_fields = array(); } self::$name_text_fields[ $form_id ] = FrmDb::get_results( 'frm_fields', array( 'form_id' => $form_id, 'type' => 'text', + 'format' => array( null, '', 'text' ), // Only get plain text fields 'name' => array( 'Name', 'Last' ), ), 'id,name', array( 'order_by' => 'field_order ASC' ) ); return self::$name_text_fields[ $form_id ]; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
classes/models/FrmEntryValidate.php
(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
classes/models/FrmEntryValidate.php (1)
Line range hint 593-681
: Verify handling of edge cases.
While the implementation looks good, please verify these scenarios:
- Multiple forms being processed in the same request
- Forms without any name fields
- Forms with customized field labels for name fields
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the edge cases.
Let me analyze the implementation and generate the final response based on the gathered information.
Edge cases are properly handled in the implementation
The code handles all the identified edge cases effectively:
-
Multiple forms in the same request:
- The
$name_text_fields
property is cached per form ID - Each form's name fields are stored separately in
self::$name_text_fields[$form_id]
- The
-
Forms without name fields:
- The code gracefully handles this by checking if
$name_field_ids
is empty - Falls back to searching for text fields named "Name" and "Last"
- The code gracefully handles this by checking if
-
Forms with custom field labels:
- The implementation primarily relies on field IDs stored in
$name_field_ids
array - The secondary check for "Name"/"Last" labeled fields is only used as a fallback
- Field labels can be customized without affecting the functionality
- The implementation primarily relies on field IDs stored in
Additional safety measures:
- Caches query results to avoid repeated database calls
- Validates values before processing
- Uses proper type checking and array existence verification
- Implements proper sanitization of inputs
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential edge cases in form configurations
# Check for forms with multiple name fields
echo "Forms with multiple name fields:"
ast-grep --pattern 'field_id.*name.*text'
# Check for forms without name fields
echo "Forms without name fields:"
ast-grep --pattern 'form_id(?!.*name)'
# Check for custom field labels
echo "Forms with custom field labels:"
ast-grep --pattern 'field.*label.*name'
Length of output: 337
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's analyze the form handling and field processing logic
# Check how forms and fields are processed
echo "Form processing implementation:"
rg -A 5 "process.*form" --type php
# Check name field handling
echo "\nName field handling:"
rg -B 2 -A 5 "name_field" --type php
# Check form validation logic
echo "\nForm validation:"
rg -B 2 -A 5 "validate.*form" --type php
# Check field type handling
echo "\nField type handling:"
rg "type.*=.*['\"](text|name)" --type php
Length of output: 64160
Fix #1781