Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing WD Item for CT_222 #56

Open
djow2019 opened this issue Apr 17, 2018 · 9 comments
Open

Missing WD Item for CT_222 #56

djow2019 opened this issue Apr 17, 2018 · 9 comments
Assignees
Labels
ChlamBase ChlamBase specific issue stalled

Comments

@djow2019
Copy link
Collaborator

djow2019 commented Apr 17, 2018

CT_222 is not found in WD even though its referenced here Q36281361
also update ortholog CTL_0475 to include CT_222

@andrewsu
Copy link
Member

Looks like CT_222 was discontinued: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/884897 which is why there is no WD item. On the scale of things, I think this is the correct behavior. @khybiske can you have a look and if you agree, close the issue?

@khybiske
Copy link
Collaborator

This is a head-scratcher. On the surface of things, I am inclined to disagree with NCBI. This gene has been tested in at least 3 studies, PMIDs: 26416906, 18391011, and 20331642. For Chlamydia, that is pretty rigorous. Its ortholog in 434/L2 is CTL0475, also validated experimentally but discontinued by NCBI. I'll let you guys make the executive decision. If it's easier to align with NCBI, and leave open for users to request an add later on, that's fine with me. ?
cc @andrewsu @djow2019

@andrewsu
Copy link
Member

andrewsu commented Apr 24, 2018

Yes, I think we should stay aligned with NCBI, but rather than waiting for users to complain I think we should proactively ask NCBI to review this case. They have a form to request corrections here:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/RefSeq/update.cgi. @khybiske, want to fill this out or shall I? either way, we should point them back to this github issues so they have the ability to comment here (though it's also possible that it would only get an email response of course)...

Also, it doesn't look like CTL0475 is discontinued https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/5858542 or am I missing something?

@khybiske
Copy link
Collaborator

Before we ping NCBI, I want to hear back from a colleague (Dan Rockey) to get his two cents. Make sure I am not imagining something.

@khybiske
Copy link
Collaborator

@andrewsu What would we specify in the request form? Clarification on why the gene was discontinued? or request that it be reissued?

@andrewsu
Copy link
Member

Both/either? I think we want to propose a reexamination of that discontinuation, and hopefully they'd share with us the rationale.

@khybiske
Copy link
Collaborator

khybiske commented May 4, 2018

Sorry, I have not yet sent in the request. I'm dealing with a stack of grant and paper deadlines. As soon as the dust settles, I can do this.

@khybiske khybiske self-assigned this Jun 7, 2018
@djow2019
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Has the request been sent?

@khybiske
Copy link
Collaborator

Ack, no.. I'll try to deal with it

@djow2019 djow2019 added the ChlamBase ChlamBase specific issue label Aug 7, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ChlamBase ChlamBase specific issue stalled
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants