-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Thread for possible enhancements in future #120
Comments
Here are a couple of suggestions:
|
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
At the moment we identify the 5/12 SNP clusters based on a percentage, since cluster picker does not accept SNP cut-offs, the conversion from SNP cut-off to percentage may cause some minor deviation due to rounding error. |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
For environments in which GPUs are available, we can selectively rely upon enhanced versions of bwa/gatk etc https://docs.nvidia.com/clara/parabricks/4.0.0/index.html |
Explore how the xbs-nf and https://github.com/kachelo/NGS-analysis-from-TB-sputum could be used together. |
This pipeline is not too different from ours, main differences:
Excellent on them for using the joint calling! |
On this subject. We currently use a single SNP to determine the presence of NTMs, this works nicely but for one exception. Mycobacterium lentiflavum does not display this SNP and is hence missed, so far we have only observed this for one sample (SMARTT-TM-046) and it makes sense that this is very rare. NTM-Profiler might be a solution for this though. |
We occasionally encounter issues with FastQ files; some are truncated, some are empty, some have unequal numbers of reads in R1 and R2. These tend to result in crashes that stop the entire run unfortunately. It would be good to run some kind of FastQ validation before FastQC (https://github.com/TORCH-Consortium/xbs-nf/blob/master/workflows/quality_check_wf.nf). Some quick searches reveal: https://genome.sph.umich.edu/wiki/FastQValidator @vrennie @'ing you after discussion to implement this asap Tracked here #131 |
@adippenaar provided me with sequencing data from a sample that evolved a Rv0678 structural variant + phenotypic BDQ resistance. Anzaan suspect a IS6110-mediated disruption. At the moment this SV is not picked up by MAGMA. |
Concerning the Structural Variants:
|
Yes this is very interesting, but this will take some serious hands-on time to implement and and test, not something for in the near future. For now the TBprofiler approach is easier 👍 |
Gotcha - thanks for the suggestions Tim 😊
Recently, while working on an analysis (on CERI MAC) I kept running across the memory failure on However, this led me to investigate a little bit about the |
|
We could also rely upon And there's always the direction of long-reads which we can explore. |
On this thread we can keep track of the enhancements which would be nice to have.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: