You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the Post-Route-Opt database of one of our internal design on ASAP7, we noticed lots of spacing DRC. After further analysis we found that for M6 the minimum spacing requirement is 0.128. But, the required spacing is 0.288 according to the parallel run length spacing table. Which indicates that we always need to maintain 0.288 spacing between two M6 shapes. So, is this spacing rule correct?
Additionally, if we need a 0.288 spacing, is it acceptable to adjust the M6 layer pitch to 0.416 (combining 0.288 spacing and 0.128 width)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the Post-Route-Opt database of one of our internal design on ASAP7, we noticed lots of spacing DRC. After further analysis we found that for M6 the minimum spacing requirement is 0.128. But, the required spacing is 0.288 according to the parallel run length spacing table. Which indicates that we always need to maintain 0.288 spacing between two M6 shapes. So, is this spacing rule correct?
Additionally, if we need a 0.288 spacing, is it acceptable to adjust the M6 layer pitch to 0.416 (combining 0.288 spacing and 0.128 width)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: