Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 21, 2024. It is now read-only.

[SUGGESTION] PluralKit syncing #12

Open
Ampflower opened this issue Jun 27, 2022 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #20
Open

[SUGGESTION] PluralKit syncing #12

Ampflower opened this issue Jun 27, 2022 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #20
Assignees

Comments

@Ampflower
Copy link
Member

Describe your feature
Sync system management with PluralKit for an all-in-one place.

Describe the solution you'd like
Allow any management of the system or member to be synced across PF and PK.
This may require storing PK's IDs as bindings as PF's IDs will likely differ. Alternatively, syncing by name maybe doable, as the member's name should be unique per system.

Describe alternatives you've considered
None.

Additional context
https://pluralkit.me/api/endpoints/

@Yu-Vitaqua-fer-Chronos
Copy link

https://pluralkit.me/api/dispatch/ exists too, not sure how recent it is but it could enable two-way syncing to and from PluralKit with ProxyFox, which would be hella useful!

@Ampflower
Copy link
Member Author

Note that on implementing that to not send to PK if the event editing the database is dispatch, or any event editing the database ultimately does not edit the database.

@Oliver-makes-code Oliver-makes-code linked a pull request Jan 11, 2023 that will close this issue
13 tasks
@Oliver-makes-code Oliver-makes-code changed the title [SUGGESTION] PluralKit syncing to allow for an all-in-one place for system management [SUGGESTION] PluralKit syncing Jan 11, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants