Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

OOM for large order and small cluster size. #47

Open
njvaughn opened this issue Apr 13, 2020 — with Slack · 0 comments
Open

OOM for large order and small cluster size. #47

njvaughn opened this issue Apr 13, 2020 — with Slack · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@njvaughn Slack
Copy link
Contributor

Can we avoid allocating interpolation points when they will fail the size check? Or is that too hairy? Maybe we add a compatibility check of the input parameters, and increase the cluster size within the code if the user uses too small a value.
@njvaughn njvaughn added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 13, 2020 — with Slack
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@njvaughn