Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
78 lines (60 loc) · 4.32 KB

README.md

File metadata and controls

78 lines (60 loc) · 4.32 KB

met_forcing_comparison

Title:

Clinton Alden Geospatial Data Analysis February 2024

This project will analyze the effectiveness of gridded meteorological products on forcing the Structure for Unifying Multiple Modeling Alternatives (SUMMA).

Forcing point snow models such as SUMMA typically draws on meteorological observations using in situ observations as forcing. However, many of the snow-covered mountainous areas of Washington lack extensive meteorological observations. Additionally, many of the few meteorological sites that do exist lack radiative flux data that is critical to the accuracy of the modeled snowpack.

Research Questions - Can gridded meteorological products such as reanalysis and model output from WRF be used as an accurate forcing dataset to force the SUMMA snow model? How does the gridded data compare to meteorological observations within each grid cell in complex topography?

Data - ERA5 reanalysis from the ECMWF, UW-Weather Research and Forecasting model from the NASA Discover servers, meteorological and snow observations from NRCS SNOTEL network

Tools/packages - primarily xarray to access gridded products in netCDF format

Methodology - Data from SNOTEL sites will be compared to the grid cells they are located in within the gridded model datasets to test the accuracy of these products in complex topography. The SUMMA model will then be initialized using both gridded products and meteorological observations to further test the veracity of these data.

Expected Outcomes - Gridded products are hypothesized to not be an effective stand-in for in situ observations for this purpose without further modifications to the original products. Additional analysis can be attempted to try to downscale gridded products to more accurately resolve complex topography with coarse reanalysis products that are widely available, such as ERA5 from the ECMWF.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Repository Organization

era5_analysis.ipynb plots the era5 temperature and precipitation data for the Olympic Mountains and creates a gif of all daily plots for the water year.

WA_DEM_plot.ipynb reads in DEM data for the state of Washington and creates plots to help orient the Buckinghorse SNOTEL station and adjacent topography.

buck_era5_proc.ipynb processed era5 netcdf data using xarray and creates a forcing netcdf that can be used to initialize SUMMA. This same script can also be used to process the WRF forcing as well with modifications to the variable names that WRF uses.

buckinghorse_summa.ipynb runs the SUMMA snow model using the pysumma fortran wrapper using the era5 forcing dataset created with processing notebook. -note: there are many other set up files needed to run summa that are not included in this repo to keep it cleaner. See https://pysumma.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html for further documentation on SUMMA initialization. This script also plots several of the forcing and output variables and compares to SNOTEL observations.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Results

In general, forcing a point snow model such as SUMMA with a course dataset such as ERA5 is not effective. This resolution of gridded reanalysis prodect fails to capture the true complexity of the terrain in the Olympic Mountains and thus underrepresents precipitation in upper elevation locations such as the Buckinghorse SNOTEL. Higher resolution products such as the 4/3 km resolution UW-WRF has much higher skill in representing the precipitation in this complex topography and thus the SUMMA run forced by WRF had significatly lower Snow Water Equivalent RMSE than the ERA5 run when compared to SNOTEL SWE observations. Moving forward with this work, higher resolution mesoscale models are the most appropriate for forcing point or high resolution snow models. In general, the resolution of the snow model should somewhat approximate the resolution of the forcing data set to effectively capture the topographic complexity of mountains in Western Washington. Pulling points from gridded meteorological datasets to force SUMMA is a successful method of generating skillful forcings as demonstrated with the WRF-initialized SUMMA run.