cpu is at high usage but it is not updating on nanopool that any shares have been mined #518
Comments
|
Can you run the checker and post what it returns? If it's using CPU then it's mining (since otherwise it can't use the CPU) so the shares should appear on the pool. Sometimes pools are slow to update their statistics but eventually things should appear. |
|
where is the checker at? |
|
Oh, you should use my new miner: https://github.com/UnamSanctam/SilentCryptoMiner, when you compile that a checker will get complied together with the miner that you can use to test/check. |
|
ok so i used the new one and i turned off stealth but still it does not show that explorer.exe is using up alot of usage and my cpu is at like less than 10% now and doesnt appear to be mining anything, but when i run the checker it says watchdog running: yes |
|
Then it's not running, post your settings here. You can press "Save" on the "Main" tab and then zip it and post that file here which is the easiest or you can screenshot the builder. You might have to change the "Startup" tabs "Filename" to something other than Microsoft since some anticheats block that folder. |
|
ok i did as you said and changed the name to 64os.exe and when i run the checker it says it works now |
|
but my question is, if i upload the checker file alone to mega and download it on my real pc and run it, will it still check for me? |
|
Yes will check for the miner (that you built) on any computer you send it to. |
|
alright |
|
one last question.... i notice your name is unam sanctam |
|
are you of south korean heritage by chance |
|
Haha no I'm Swedish. |
|
ah ok lol |
|
also when i ended the nslookup in task manager which is what i assume the miner used to cloak itself, after i ended it, it did not start up again |
|
The program it injects into depends on what you choose, but the watchdog will start it up again after about 3 minutes of being closed so that it won't be too fast. |
|
another question is, the uninstall and checker and the miner starter all disappeared from the directory i had it in and was changed to a prefetch file for some reason, how do i uninstall it without the uninstaller? |
|
You can uninstall it manually https://github.com/UnamSanctam/SilentXMRMiner/wiki#how-do-i-remove-the-miner. |
|
ok also there is another issue, i used your unam downloader to bind a program setup and the my xmr stub made with your updated crypto miner, however it does not seem to work. when i run the stub by itself and check it with the checker it says it is running, but when i run the binded file it does not work. |
|
Is the download link you entered into the downloader correct? Does it work if you use the Unam Binder (less can go wrong with the binder)? |
|
i have not tried unam binder yet, but let me do that. |
|
i have updated the link, but it still says "this program may of not have been installed correctly" when running the binded file. let me see if the checker works though |
|
Ok its picking it up now |
|
Ok because if it says "this program may of not have been installed correctly" then you've forgotten .exe after the filename when binding it. |
|
|
|
ok so i did some testing and it does get flagged by windows defender. even when added to windows defender exclusions. anyway to fix? |
|
Are you running it as administrator? It can't add exclusions without that (which is what the shield means). |
|
yes so i have updated it and checked "run as administrator" and it still flags it. also when i download it onto my rdp it automatically flags it aswell. |
|
Do you mean that the bound file (that the binder generated) gets detected or that some file (like the miner that gets extracted) gets detected after running the bound file? |
|
the bound file |
|
i compiled it and uploaded it and when i downloaded it, it gets flagged with this |
|
even when compiled with a start delay and run as admin and add to windows defender exclusions |
|
Yes of course it will be detected, it's a free and open source project on GitHub, meaning that it will get detected. Every project on GitHub that can be used maliciously will always become detected sooner or later. To circumvent detections you'd probably need a crypter. |
|
do you have any suggestions for a good crypter? |
|
No I haven't used (or purchased) any crypters in a few years so all those that I know don't really exist anymore (and my experiences with those aren't that relevant anymore even if they still existed). |
|
hey so whenever i try making a gpu silent miner it never works. ive tried rvn, etc, and eth all with no avail. any idea what may cause issues? ive put in all the correct values and everything but it never starts up when i run it. |
|
What GPU do you have? Can you run the checker and post what it returns? |
|
i have an nvidia gtx 1060 max q design. its a laptop graphics card. when i run the checker it shows "compatible gpus" and shows my gpu 0 and gpu 1, 0 being the integrated graphics and 1 being my 1060. and under miners it is blank. i noticed it does not even start injecting the process and get my computer at a high gpu usage |
|
Can you try the example settings at the top of the wiki https://github.com/UnamSanctam/SilentCryptoMiner/wiki? In case it's because of your settings. |
i believe i have everything done correctly, should i send you the json output? |
|
Sure. |
|
also, with the wallet address input, do i have to do the whole format of WalletAddress.WorkerName/WithdrawalPasswordor can i just paste my wallet address? |
|
For nanopool you would enter the whole format just so that you can edit the minimum payout, but if you don't want to change that or have a worker name then just entering the wallet address works fine. |
|
Hi so it seems that when I use your new miner and create a stub for the rvn miner, and then bind it with either unam binder or downloader, it does not work |
|
What does it say if you run the checker? |
first 5 minutes of testing and got around 5 shares, and so then i leave it running for almost two hours now and it shows that it is inactive when on my test pc aka my rdp it shows the high usage under file explorer, almost as if its mining, but on nanopool it shows that the worker is inactive. help?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: