You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
your neutral vote on DeFi chains DEFIP B. I fully respect your voting. I just want to make you aware that for DEFIPs a 2/3 approval voting is needed. I case you didn’t know. Currently the majority is approving the proposal. So for me your neutral position is basically a vote for no. Maybe you can reconsider your position and if becoming positive change for yes. Thanks a lot! A fellow DeFi chain enthusiast.
My take on the DEFIP-B: The main benefit is the constant dUSD buy pressure. This is to tackle the main reason for the dUSD depeg: The different DFI prices in the pools (DFI-dUSD and DFI-dUSDC/T). DFIP-B just helps to align the prices and with this to bring back the Peg. Burning of dUSD is just a good secondary side effect. It’s not mainly about reducing dUSD supply.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
your neutral vote on DeFi chains DEFIP B. I fully respect your voting. I just want to make you aware that for DEFIPs a 2/3 approval voting is needed. I case you didn’t know. Currently the majority is approving the proposal. So for me your neutral position is basically a vote for no. Maybe you can reconsider your position and if becoming positive change for yes. Thanks a lot! A fellow DeFi chain enthusiast.
My take on the DEFIP-B: The main benefit is the constant dUSD buy pressure. This is to tackle the main reason for the dUSD depeg: The different DFI prices in the pools (DFI-dUSD and DFI-dUSDC/T). DFIP-B just helps to align the prices and with this to bring back the Peg. Burning of dUSD is just a good secondary side effect. It’s not mainly about reducing dUSD supply.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: