Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Content Feedback - New Tools Page #1974

Open
digitalchild opened this issue Nov 10, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Content Feedback - New Tools Page #1974

digitalchild opened this issue Nov 10, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
[Admin] Handbook Improvements or additions to the Training Team Handbook

Comments

@digitalchild
Copy link
Contributor

I see time and time again people asking about the tools creators are using for screen captures etc. I think it would be great if we had a page we could direct people to that would list the various tools people use.

There are plenty of open source/free options for creating content.

We could also have a section on programming related tools as well.

Overview

  • Content title: Learn Content Tools
  • Content URL: none yet
  • Are you reporting an error (such as outdated information), or providing improvement ideas?:

Feedback Details

Create a new page with a list of various tools creators can use.

Next steps for Training Team member

Please follow the team handbook "Validating Content Feedback issues" to validate this feedback.

@digitalchild digitalchild added Awaiting Triage Issues awaiting triage. See Training Team handbook for how to triage issues. [Content] Feedback Feedback provided about content on Learn. labels Nov 10, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Awaiting Validation in LearnWP Content - Feedback Nov 10, 2023
@kaitohm
Copy link
Contributor

kaitohm commented Nov 11, 2023

This makes sense. Listing open source softwares, and even sharing step-by-step resources on how to use those would be great.

I'm thinking this content would be a handbook page, rather than something that lives on Learn. Would you agree?

Related resource: https://make.wordpress.org/training/handbook/tutorials/creating-a-tutorial/#step-1-choose-software (What we currently list in the handbook regarding recording software.)

@kaitohm kaitohm added [Admin] Handbook Improvements or additions to the Training Team Handbook and removed Awaiting Triage Issues awaiting triage. See Training Team handbook for how to triage issues. [Content] Feedback Feedback provided about content on Learn. labels Nov 11, 2023
@kaitohm kaitohm moved this to In Progress in Training Team Administration Nov 11, 2023
@jonathanbossenger
Copy link
Collaborator

I'm thinking this content would be a handbook page, rather than something that lives on Learn. Would you agree?

@bsanevans as someone who was part of this conversation, that was the original idea. As we don't have a "Handbook Feedback" issue template, I suggested Jamie use "Content Feedback". Maybe adding a new template for handbook updates would also be a good idea going forward.

That being said, I also wonder if a tutorial on the different options would be useful, especially showing how to use free and open source products, instead of those with free trials that have restrictions (ie the Descript watermark).

@digitalchild
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, a handbook page is where it should live. Having the tutorials might become dated quickly though due to how quickly some products change.

@kaitohm
Copy link
Contributor

kaitohm commented Nov 14, 2023

Cool, thanks for the clarification. We'll consider what the best template may be for the handbook as part of the GitHub project 📝

I agree, a tutorial sounds great, but I also see they could get outdated just as quick... Maybe periodic Online Workshops? More food for thought when we discuss this in the team meeting today 🙂

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
[Admin] Handbook Improvements or additions to the Training Team Handbook
Projects
Status: 👋 Ready to Create
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants