Tracking Contributions: Training team

[angelasjin]

Following some conversations with Courtney (Traning team rep), there are a few suggested contributions for tracking:

• Updating site functionality, by tracking issues, assignments, and commenters in the Learn Github (probably done automatically by Tracking Contributions: Make Documentation team #178)
• Tracking who publishes lesson plans, workshops, courses on Learn WordPress.
• Add activity when added as a presenter for Learn workshop. Will be fixed by Profiles: Add activity when added as a presenter for Learn workshop wordpress.org#84
• Ideally, we'll be able to also track who reviews them in the future as well.

[courtneyr-dev]

Looks good @angelasjin. We also use HelpScout. #177

Tracking contributions on Learn would indicate also the development of the site and content on Learn. We are planning to implement hosting/facilitating SLS as well into our GitHub.

We'd still want to track activity in Learn as occasionally folks will do a blast across the site. They might test code snippets on many posts, or swap screenshots due to a release, etc. Our content has corresponding GitHub issues, but we also have need of folks to do a chunk of auditing that touches many issues. Tracking Learn activity would help identify that.

[courtneyr-dev]

Tracking contributions in sites could also help measure contributions on https://jobs.wordpress.net as well. Posts there are reviewed and published. They are received by a job poster submitting a form, sit as a Custom Post Type, and await one of the volunteers to vet and publish.

[iandunn]

issues, assignments, and commenters in the Learn Github

👍🏻 . My comments for the Docs team applies equally to this.

publishes lesson plans, workshops, courses [...] track who reviews them.

👍🏻

[iandunn]

Tracking who publishes lesson plans, workshops, courses on Learn WordPress.

That's done now

[iandunn]

Ideally, we'll be able to also track who reviews them in the future as well.

I have several questions for that. Lesson plans and workshops have these custom statuses:

• Draft
• Needs Vetting
• Approved For Video
• Declined
• More Info Requested
• Needs Video Review
• Needs Grammar Review
• Needs SEO Review
• Needs Tech Review
• Unlisted

• Should a reviewer get an activity item the first time they move a given post to a different status? Or should it be for activity each time they change a status for that post? The latter could be pretty noisy, so we might want to digest them, similar to Tracking Contributions: Make Documentation team #178.

[username] Vetted a lesson plan on Learn WordPress
[username] Reviewed SEO for a lesson plan on Learn WordPress
[username] Requested more info for a lesson plan on Learn WordPress
vs simply
[username] Reviewed a lesson plan on Learn WordPress

( Either way, they'd get at least one activity item for every post they review. I'm just asking if they should get 7 items for reviewing 7 things on the same post )

---

• Should the activity include the title, even though the post isn't published yet? e.g.,

[username] Reviewed a lesson plan on Learn WordPress
vs
[username] Reviewed the lesson plan, Anatomy Of A Theme, on Learn WordPress

---

• What about declined & unlisted statuses? Should those show up on a reviewers' profile? There could be similar privacy concerns to Tracking Contributions: HelpScout #177?

---

• I don't see any kind of review process for Courses; is that correct?

[iandunn]

@courtneyr-dev , @angelasjin : do you have any thoughts on the questions above?