From e2c619d7585ed38f4c9d06324a3f45e5aecc5e7a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Robert Anderson <robert@noisysocks.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 12:32:53 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] Change CodeEditor test to use a snapshot test

We only care that the component renders without an error and doesn't
change unintentionally, which makes this a perfect use case for snapshot
testing.
---
 components/code-editor/test/__snapshots__/index.js.snap | 7 +++++++
 components/code-editor/test/index.js                    | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 components/code-editor/test/__snapshots__/index.js.snap

diff --git a/components/code-editor/test/__snapshots__/index.js.snap b/components/code-editor/test/__snapshots__/index.js.snap
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..145b69b94d7d07
--- /dev/null
+++ b/components/code-editor/test/__snapshots__/index.js.snap
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+// Jest Snapshot v1, https://goo.gl/fbAQLP
+
+exports[`CodeEditor should render without an error 1`] = `
+<textarea
+  value="<b>wowee</b>"
+/>
+`;
diff --git a/components/code-editor/test/index.js b/components/code-editor/test/index.js
index b1be6fa9ddeb0e..ce29b4c331cecb 100644
--- a/components/code-editor/test/index.js
+++ b/components/code-editor/test/index.js
@@ -18,6 +18,6 @@ describe( 'CodeEditor', () => {
 		} ) );
 
 		const wrapper = shallow( <CodeEditor value={ '<b>wowee</b>' } /> );
-		expect( wrapper.find( 'textarea' ) ).toHaveLength( 1 );
+		expect( wrapper ).toMatchSnapshot();
 	} );
 } );