Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 12, 2019. It is now read-only.

Could someone nudge Squeel's depenedence of polyamorous? #24

Open
ssnyder opened this issue Aug 11, 2017 · 4 comments
Open

Could someone nudge Squeel's depenedence of polyamorous? #24

ssnyder opened this issue Aug 11, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@ssnyder
Copy link

ssnyder commented Aug 11, 2017

I know - this is not Squeel.....I am using Squeel, and am trying to update my ransack gem - unfortunately ransack uses a newer version of the polyamorous gem and Squeel is stuck on the 1.1.0 version. Is there anyone here who can bump it up for us or allow it to use a newer version? If there is an incompatibility that would be good to inform folks about over on the Squeel repo. There are a number of us who are working on older code and it takes time to upgrade it - so switching to BabySqueel is not an option for me as of yet (I'm still on Rails/ActiveRecord 3.x)

This request was made a long time ago (and is still open) on the squeel repo here on activerecord-hackory/squeel. I'm hoping someone here has the ability to help out here!

@scarroll32
Copy link
Member

I'm not a user of Squeel, but if you have an idea how to fix this please submit a PR.

@ssnyder
Copy link
Author

ssnyder commented Jan 3, 2018

I was hoping that someone here knew someone maintaining squeal - there is an open request there for a long time to update the polyamorous gem - but there has been no response. I'm guessing that I'm out of luck if you don't know who is maintaining squeal. (It was a longshot.....but I was still hopeful)

@scarroll32
Copy link
Member

Hi @ssnyder I'll see if I can bump the polyamorous version in Squeal. Will keep you posted.

@ernie
Copy link
Contributor

ernie commented Jan 3, 2018

Also, please bump it in Squeel. ;)

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants