Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

nHoles different in KF and GX2F #3906

Open
2 tasks
AJPfleger opened this issue Nov 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
2 tasks

nHoles different in KF and GX2F #3906

AJPfleger opened this issue Nov 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
Improvement Changes to an existing feature Track Fitting

Comments

@AJPfleger
Copy link
Contributor

Problem

As discussed in today's meeting:
There is a difference in holes between KF and GX2F. This might be due to the fact, that the KF cannot drop any bad surfaces after refining the parameters. Only way to tackle this would be to do a new fit with improved parameters. This is not really planned. Maybe we can add in the future a way to add additional curves to the plots to show what would happen, if the KF does multiple iterations.

Image

Additional resources

The comparison for the fitters will be introduced here:

Tasks

  • Compare to GSF
  • Redo KF a second time and compare
@AJPfleger AJPfleger added Improvement Changes to an existing feature Track Fitting labels Nov 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Improvement Changes to an existing feature Track Fitting
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant