-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 314
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add open liberty under thirdparty container tests #367
Comments
Followed the below steps in this link - https://github.com/OpenLiberty/open-liberty export JAVA_HOME=/home/chandrams/java_builds/jdk8u162-b12_openj9-0.8.0 Executed the below command to run the unit tests:
To run one of the FAT test - build.example_fat, executed the below command:
|
Installed ant version 1.10.3 and the ran the below FAT test, it worked fine now. Need to figure out how to run all FAT tests ./gradlew build.example_fat:buildandrun generateReports: archiveReports: execute: BUILD SUCCESSFUL BUILD SUCCESSFUL in 24s |
Got a list of FAT testsuites using ls command, there were 75 tests out of which 42 tests passed and rest failed. The tests take a long time to run around 20 hrs or so. Checked with Andrew Guibert from the WAS team, he suggested that we could just run only the unit tests as the WAS org has extensive infra to run all 90k+ FAT tests for OpenLiberty and WAS Liberty on hundreds of combinations of OSes and JDKs on a weekly basis, and they would report issues on Openj9 if any. |
Found few intermittent issues while initializing and building the liberty test material. Fetching some of the artifacts fail: ./gradlew cnf:initialize
./gradlew assemble :com.ibm.websphere.appserver.features:releaseNeeded
|
When the initialization and build is successful, unit tests failed with the below issue:
Exception details from the logs:
Will submit multiple runs to check if they are intermittent or machine specific. |
Close it in favor of #552 |
Evaluate and include open liberty tests under third party container tests
https://github.com/OpenLiberty/open-liberty
#172
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: