You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Effective masses along two directions are highly anisotropic for a isotropic 2D sheet of GaS. Also the fractional coordinates are not zero for other axis.
#15
Open
ashima29R opened this issue
Dec 4, 2017
· 4 comments
@ashima29R Did you ever resolve this issue? We are having similar problems with MoS2, where it appears that one of the two in plane-effective masses is swapped for the out-of-plane effective mass.
Dear Sir;
Greeting from India!!
The effective mass for GaS is coming out to be highly anisotropic whereas
the effective mass for InSe which is similar in physical struture and
bandstructure to GaS is reported to be highly isotropic (*Nanoscale*, 2017,
*9*, 14682-146089). Also I have tried using emc for InSe but it give very
highly anisotopic values in x and y directions. This was not an issue with
MoS2 ans WS2 which I have calculated earlier , the masses along x and y
direction were coming out to be isotropic
Thanking You;
With Regards;
Ashima Rawat
For GaS 2D monolayer (INPCAR file)
-0.1839 0.3678 0.0000 ! K-POINT in the reciprocal crystal coord. (3 floats)
0.001 ! step size in 1/Bohr units (1 float)
36 ! band number, (1 integer)
V
3.640527884 -6.305579262 0.000000000
3.640527884 6.305579262 0.000000000
0.000000000 0.000000000 16.393389123 ! program identifier (1)
the vasp output:
Effective mass (0): -2.029
Original eigenvectors: 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
Normal fractional coordinates: -0.03064 1.00000 0.00335
Effective mass (1): -13.022
Original eigenvectors: 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
Normal fractional coordinates: 1.00000 0.52286 -0.01380
~
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: