Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Effective masses along two directions are highly anisotropic for a isotropic 2D sheet of GaS. Also the fractional coordinates are not zero for other axis. #15

Open
ashima29R opened this issue Dec 4, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@ashima29R
Copy link

For GaS 2D monolayer (INPCAR file)
-0.1839 0.3678 0.0000 ! K-POINT in the reciprocal crystal coord. (3 floats)
0.001 ! step size in 1/Bohr units (1 float)
36 ! band number, (1 integer)
V
3.640527884 -6.305579262 0.000000000
3.640527884 6.305579262 0.000000000
0.000000000 0.000000000 16.393389123 ! program identifier (1)

the vasp output:
Effective mass (0): -2.029
Original eigenvectors: 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
Normal fractional coordinates: -0.03064 1.00000 0.00335

Effective mass (1): -13.022
Original eigenvectors: 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
Normal fractional coordinates: 1.00000 0.52286 -0.01380

~

@VincentVandalon
Copy link

@ashima29R Did you ever resolve this issue? We are having similar problems with MoS2, where it appears that one of the two in plane-effective masses is swapped for the out-of-plane effective mass.

@afonari
Copy link
Owner

afonari commented May 7, 2018

What is the 'expected' output?

@VincentVandalon
Copy link

VincentVandalon commented May 7, 2018

For the electrons at the T point (direction) of MoS2 we expect:

  • effective mass in-plane1 == effective mass in-plane2 (in-plane -> with k vector in xy plane)
  • A much higher out of plane mass (k vector in z direction)

But we find:

  • effective mass in-plane1 == effective mass out-of-plane
  • effective mass in-plane-2 >>> effective mass in-plane1

The weird thing is, this does not happen for other k-points. Using VASP by the way.

@ashima29R
Copy link
Author

ashima29R commented May 8, 2018 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants