You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Note the below framing of this feature assumes #250 is either already done or this could be done as part of #250.
Publishing a spec via my_spec.publish() should be a thin wrapper for the following:
reg = get the default WebRegistry (which depends on whether local test flag is set)
my_spec.to_registry(reg)
Once identifiers are hashes, this should never fail since identifiers of two different specs will be unique.
Then we would need a different mechanism for allowing human readable names of specs (to make sharing easier/more intuitive). Perhaps something akin to git branches.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Note the below framing of this feature assumes #250 is either already done or this could be done as part of #250.
Publishing a spec via
my_spec.publish()
should be a thin wrapper for the following:Once identifiers are hashes, this should never fail since identifiers of two different specs will be unique.
Then we would need a different mechanism for allowing human readable names of specs (to make sharing easier/more intuitive). Perhaps something akin to git branches.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: