Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TLM-AT #3

Open
myzinsky opened this issue Aug 21, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

TLM-AT #3

myzinsky opened this issue Aug 21, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@myzinsky
Copy link

If I understand it correctly your VP is using the TLM-LT coding style. Have you considered also using TLM-AT for more detailed performance analysis?

@aboood8888

This comment has been minimized.

@myzinsky
Copy link
Author

I know what is LT and AT And which methods are used for these coding styles. My question was just if AT is considered for the future.

@drom
Copy link

drom commented Oct 20, 2022

Yes, it would be interesting how your VP would bridge with AT models

@Cirromulus
Copy link
Member

In principle it is possible to increase accuracy to AT, as long as it is still TLM.
We did not consider it yet, as it had no benefit for our usecase yet. But we are open to PRs or discussions in general.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants