Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Does the task of diffusion-based dense prediction come to an end? #19

Open
Boatsure opened this issue Feb 20, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Does the task of diffusion-based dense prediction come to an end? #19

Boatsure opened this issue Feb 20, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@Boatsure
Copy link

Thanks for your comprehensive ablation experiments!

Since Marigold proposed the terminology “monocular depth estimation based on the diffusion model”, the research in this sub-field has been advancing rapidly. One article after another is brilliant, but they all seem to reveal one fact: that based on the standard diffusion process, the less it resembles the original diffusion and the closer it is to the discriminative method, the higher the accuracy of the depth or normal estimation.

When the forward process becomes single-step and does not require text prompt, and the denoising process becomes single-step and does not require the participation of noise, does GenPercept still belong to diffusion methods? Has the ship of Theseus entered the ocean of discriminative method?

Specifically, at what level does the GenPercept belong to the diffusion model?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant