Are you looking for volume / coverage or depth / substance?

[samuelgoto]

The direction that I'm getting from Peter is that, given the choice, we'd rather see fewer (e.g. 1 or 2) but higher quality visualizations (e.g. it complements substantially the learning experience from reading the book alone or attending the class alone) than lots (e.g. 10+) of low quality visualizations (e.g. there is better material out there).

I think this is a reasonable trade-off because it (a) sets the precedent for the quality bar we and (b) enables people to use it right away, at the cost of coverage of the book.

I dunno if this is a hard criteria that can be applied blindly (e.g. perhaps there is only so much that one can do to explain a specific set of algorithms), but more of a general intuition (e.g. to the best of our knowledge, that's the current line of thinking).

@redblobgames, fyi

[samuelgoto]

I wrote down more concretely how we are judging quality here.

[migom6]

Hey @samuelgoto, I am trying for gsoc this year. Since I have no prior work with visualization to show and have less time to solve bugs. Can I send a proposal with design and a prototype mainly an implementation of a part of the prototype?
Thanks 😃.

[samuelgoto]

You want to follow this: https://github.com/aimacode/aima-javascript/wiki/GSOC-2018 (apologies for the brevity, sent from phone)

…

On Mar 5, 2018 7:24 AM, "Madhurjya Pegu" ***@***.***> wrote: Hey @samuelgoto <https://github.com/samuelgoto>, I am trying for gsoc this year. Since I have no prior work with visualization to show and have less time to solve bugs. Can I send a proposal with design and a prototype mainly an implementation of a part of the prototype? Thanks 😃. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#152 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAqV6o3rlJDhwX1BWbfZBRj6p7PJaxCSks5tbVidgaJpZM4SOkHT> .