You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now the Page component acts a flex container, allowing to render Artboard's and SymbolMaster's in either a column or a row.
I'd like however to have unlimited flexibility rendering Pages by composing Flex components. By having some sort of arbitrary Flex container, I could layout items on a Page in complex grids if necessary.
This would require us introducing a new Component that can be utilized to compute Yoga layout, but doesn't actually result in any backed rendering.
@mathieudutour - I know this goes against some of your comments in #291, but I'm not sure how else to achieve this.
note: it doesn't need to be called Flex.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes I can see the use case. Maybe we could make it super clear and have it as a component exposed on the Page component like Page.Container or something. That way we don't create a new component per se so it might be easier to understand where and how to use it.
Right now the
Page
component acts a flex container, allowing to renderArtboard
's andSymbolMaster
's in either a column or a row.I'd like however to have unlimited flexibility rendering Pages by composing
Flex
components. By having some sort of arbitraryFlex
container, I could layout items on aPage
in complex grids if necessary.This would require us introducing a new Component that can be utilized to compute Yoga layout, but doesn't actually result in any backed rendering.
@mathieudutour - I know this goes against some of your comments in #291, but I'm not sure how else to achieve this.
note: it doesn't need to be called
Flex
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: